Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T23:56:08.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N Reid ,
RA McDonald  and
WI Montgomery
N Reid*
Affiliation:
Quercus, Queen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK
RA McDonald
Affiliation:
Central Science Library, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK
WI Montgomery
Affiliation:
Quercus, Queen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: neil.reid@qub.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hare coursing is a widespread but controversial activity. In an attempt to reduce hare mortality and mitigate the activity's impact on hare welfare, the Irish Coursing Club introduced measures including the compulsory muzzling of dogs in 1993. However, the efficacy of these measures remained the subject of heated debate. Official records, corroborated by independent video evidence, were used to assess the fate of individual Irish hares (Lepus timidus hibernicus) during coursing events from 1988-2004. Muzzling dogs significantly reduced levels of hare mortality. In courses using unmuzzled dogs from 1988/89-1992/93 mean hare mortality was 15.8%, compared to 4.1% in courses using muzzled dogs from 1993/94-2003/04. Further reductions in mortality could not be accounted for by muzzling dogs, supporting the efficacy of other factors such as improved hare husbandry. The duration of the head start given to the hare prior to the release of the dogs significantly affected the outcome of the course. Hares that were killed had head starts of greater duration than those that were chased but survived, suggesting the former may have been slower. The selection of hares by assessment of their running ability may provide means to reduce hare mortality during courses further. Our findings support the efficacy of measures taken to mitigate the impact of coursing on individual hares. However, it is necessary to evaluate the impact of removing hares from the source population and of returning coursed hares to the wild before the wider impact of coursing on wild hare populations can be determined.

Keywords

animal welfarefield sportshunting with dogsLepus timidusmountain harewelfare
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H 1983 Information measure and model selection. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 50(1): 277–291Google Scholar
Anonymous 2002 A summary of directives, instructions and guidance notes issued by the executive committee of the Irish Coursing Club to the club secretaries, control stewards, judges and slippers. Irish Coursing Club, IrelandGoogle Scholar
Baker, PJ, Harris, S and Webbon, C 2002 Effect of British hunting ban on fox numbers. Nature 419: 34 Bateson P and Bradshaw E 1997 Physiological effects of hunting red deer Cervus elaphus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; Biological Sciences 264: 1707–1714Google ScholarPubMed
Bröekhuizen, S 1976 The situation of hare populations in the Netherlands. In: Pielowski, Z and Pucek, Z (eds) Ecology and Management of European Hare Populations pp 1–2. Polish Hunting Association: Warsaw, PolandGoogle Scholar
Burns Lord Edwards, V, Marsh, J, Soulsby, Lord and Winter, M 2000 Report of the committee of inquiry into hunting with dogs in England and Wales. HMSO Norwich: England, UKGoogle Scholar
Chepko-Sade, BD and Halpin, ZT 1987 Mammalian Dispersal Patterns: The effects of social structure on population genetics. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Dahl, F 2005 Life and death of the mountain hare in the boreal forest of Sweden. PhD Thesis, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Umea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Dyrcz, A, Wink, M, Kruszewicz, A and Leisler, B 2005 Male reproductive success is correlated with blood parasite levels and body condition in the promiscuous aquatic warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. Auk 122(2): 558–565Google Scholar
Fielding, AH and Haworth, PF 1995 Testing the generality of bird-habitat models. Conservation Biology 9: 1466–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galisteo, AM, Cano, MR, Morales, JL, Vivo, J and Miró, F 1998 The influence of speed and height at the withers on the kinematics of sound horses at the hand-led trot. Veterinary Research Communications 226: 415–424Google Scholar
Game Preservation Special Protection for Irish Hares Order Northern Ireland 2003 Statutory Rule 2003, No 534. Government Printer for Northern Ireland (UK). ISBN 0337953260Google Scholar
Graf, RP 1985 Social organisation of snowshoe hares. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 468–474Google Scholar
Holley, AJF 1986 A hierarchy of hares: dominance status and access to oestrous does. Mammal Review 16(3/4): 181–186Google Scholar
Hunting Act 2004 Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament England and Wales (UK). ISBN 0105437042Google Scholar
ICABS 2005 Irish Council Against Blood Sports. http://www.ban-bloodsports.com/Google Scholar
Kreeger, TJ, Monson, D, Kuechle, VB, Seal, US and Tester, JR 1989 Monitoring heart rate and body temperature in red foxes Vulpes vulpes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 2455–2458Google Scholar
Kruuk, LEB, Clutton-Brock, TH, Albon, SD, Pemberton, JM and Guiness, FE 1999 Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature 399: 459–461Google ScholarPubMed
LACS 2005 League Against Cruel Sports. http://www.league.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Letty, J, Marchandeau, S, Clobert, J and Aubineau, J 2000 Improving translocation success: an experimental study of antistress treatment and release method for wild rabbits. Animal Conservation 3: 21 1–219Google Scholar
Macdonald, DW, Tattersall, FH, Johnston, PJ, Carbone, C, Reynolds, JC, Langbein, J, Rushton, SP and Shirley, MDF 2000 Management and control of populations of foxes, deer, hares and mink in England and Wales and the impact ofhunting with dogs. The Stationery Office, London: 206. http://www.huntinginquiry.gov.uk/mainsections/research/macdonaldfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Marboutin, E, Bray, Y, Péroux, R, Mauvy, B and Lartiges, A 2003 Population dynamics in European hare: breeding parameters and sustainable harvest rates. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 580–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molony, SE, Dowding, CV, Baker, PJ, Cuthill, IC and Harris, S 2006 The effect of translocation and temporary captivity on wildlife rehabilitation success: An experimental study using European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus. Biological Conservation 130: 530–53710.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, DL, Keith, LB and Cary, JR 1998 Do parasitism and nutritional status interact to affect production in Snowshoe hares? Ecology 79(4): 1209–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, S, Allison, P, Smith, A, Graham, I and Thirgood, S 2007 The role of parasites and nutrition in driving unstable population dynamics in the mountain hare (Lepus timidus). In: Sjöberg K and Rooke T (eds) Proceedings of the International Union of Game Biologists XXVII Congress p 117. Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Paci, G, Bagliacca, M and Lavazza, A 2006 Stress evaluation in hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas) captured for translocation. Italian Journal of Animal Science 5(2): 175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, HD and Thompson, R 1971 Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protection of Wild Mammals Scotland Act 2002 Queen's Printer for Scotland (UK). ISBN 010590032XGoogle Scholar
Quinn, GP and Keough, MJ 2002 Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, N, Dingerkus, K, Montgomery, WI, Marnell, F, Jeffrey, R, Lynn, D, Kingston, N and McDonald, RA 2007 Status of hares in Ireland; Hare survey of Ireland 2006/7. In: Marnell F and Kingston N (eds) National parks and wildlife service, Department of environment, heritage and local government, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
Schulte-Hostedde, AI and Millar, JS 2002 Effects of body size and mass on running speed of male yellow-pine chipmunks Tamias amoenus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 1584–1587Google Scholar
Stoate, C and Tapper, SC 1990 The impact of three hunting methods on brown hare populations in Britain. Game and Wildlife Science 10: 229–240Google Scholar
Trombulak, SC 1989 Running speed and body mass in Belding's ground squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 194–197Google Scholar
UFAW 1979 Hares. In: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (eds) The Report and Accounts 1978-79 pp 6-9. Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar