Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T16:59:58.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Domestic Hens Have Declarative Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B Forkman*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Scotland
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C D and Dickinson, A 1981 Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33B: 109–11Google Scholar
Dennet, D 1988 The intentional stance in theory and practice. In: Byrne, R W and Whitten, A (eds) Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Etienne, A S 1984 The meaning of object permanence at different zoological levels. Human Development Π: 309320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P C and Straub, J J 1979 Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Proceedings 5: 6578Google ScholarPubMed
McFarland, D 1989 Problems of Animal Behaviour. Longman: Harlow, UKGoogle Scholar
Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G and Zanforlin, M 1995 Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Animal Behaviour 50: 203211CrossRefGoogle Scholar