Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:59:16.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of on-farm methods to assess the animal-human relationship in laying hens kept in non-cage systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J Raubek ,
K Niebuhr  and
S Waiblinger
J Raubek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria
K Niebuhr*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria
S Waiblinger
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Knut.Niebuhr@vu-wien.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a set of tests to assess the reaction of laying hens towards humans in non-cage systems and to investigate the repeatability within and between days.

Based on a literature survey six tests were developed or modified, which were examined for practicability and adapted in a first phase. Reactions of hens were recorded directly or with a video camera. These included the reaction towards a stationary person: stockperson (SPs); experimenter: (SPe); a moving person: (moving through flock [MP]; approaching individual hens measuring avoidance distance [AD]) and a complex test including stationary and moving elements: (arm moving to touch hens [touch test] in the litter [Tl] and on the slatted area [Ts]). Six flocks of five farms were visited twice, one week apart. At each visit the six tests were performed during morning and afternoon hours. The order of the tests differed between farms.

Repeatability of flock reactions within as well as between days was high for SPs, AD and Tl. SPe and especially MP showed slightly reduced correlations. Touching hens at the droppings pit (Ts) was less repeatable than in the litter area (Tl).

To sum up, first experiences show that most tests can be practically used in groups of hens in non-cage systems and seem to have good repeatability.

Keywords

animal welfarehuman-animal relationshiplaying hennon-cage systemson-farm assessmentrepeatability
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 173 - 175
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, JL and Hemsworth, PH 1994 The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on behavioural, physiological and production responses of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 4: 187–100Google Scholar
Cransberg, PH, Hemsworth, PH and Coleman, GJ 2000 Human factors affecting the behaviour and productivity of commercial broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 41: 272–279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, H and Taylor, A 2001 Discrimination between individual humans by domestic fowl. British Poultry Science 42: 267–279Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL and Jones, RB 1993 Situational factors that influence the level of fear of humans by laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RB 1994 Regular handling and the domestic chick's fear of human beings: generalisation of response. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keer-Keer, S, Hughes, BO, Hocking, PM and Jones, RB 1996 Behavioural comparison of layer and broiler fowl measuring fear responses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Boivin, X, Pedersen, V, Tosi, M, Janczak, AM, Visser, EK and Jones, RB 2006 Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 185–242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001Google Scholar