Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T01:49:41.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation and animal welfare issues arising from forestry practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

DT Blumstein
DT Blumstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA
*
email: marmots@ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forestry practices may directly kill animals as well as destroy and fragment their habitat. Even without habitat destruction, logging and its associated forest management practices (which include road building, re-forestation, and often increased recreational use) create noise, frighten animals, and may lead to changes in species composition as well as evolutionary responses to the myriad of anthropogenic impacts. Thus, forestry practices may create conservation problems. Forestry practices may also create welfare problems that may act on different temporal and spatial scales than the conservation problems. The individuals affected by forestry may have heightened glucocorticoid levels that may lead to a predictable set of deleterious consequences. Individuals may no longer be able to communicate, or they may no longer be attractive to potential mates. Such welfare problems may generate conservation problems if fitness is reduced. Identifying the set of possible impacts is the first step towards improving welfare and aiding wildlife conservation in managed forests.

Keywords

animal behaviouranimal welfareconservationforestryhuman impactsstress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altizer, S, Foufopoulos, J and Gager, A 2001 Diseases and conservation. In: Levin, S (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Volume 2 pp 109–126. Academic Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, VJ and Van Vuren, DH 2004 Gap-crossing decisions by the red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), a forest-dependent small mammal. Conservation Biology 18: 689–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednekoff, PA 2007 Foraging in the face of danger. In: Stevens, DW, Brown, JS and Ydenberg, RC (eds) Foraging: Behavior and Ecology pp 305–329. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, FB, Hauser, MD and Jones, JH 1995 The endocrine stress response and alarm vocalizations in rhesus macaques. Animal Behaviour 49: 1703–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, DT 2007a The evolution of alarm communication in rodents: structure, function, and the puzzle of apparently altruistic calling in rodents. In: Wolff, JO and Sherman, PW (eds) Rodent Societies pp 317–327. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, DT 2007b Darwinian decision-making: putting the adaptive into adaptive management. Conservation Biology 21: 552–553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, DT and Turner, AC 2005 Can the acoustic adaptation hypothesis predict the structure of Australian birdsong? Acta Ethologica 15: 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, DT, Fernández-Juricic, E, Zollner, PA and Garity, SC 2005 Interspecific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 943–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, DT, Patton, ML and Saltzman, W 2006 Faecal glucocorticoid metabolites and alarm calling in free-living yellow-bellied marmots. Biology Letters 2: 29–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boinski, S, Gross, TS and Davis, JK 1999 Terrestrial predator alarm vocalizations are a valid monitor of stress in captive brown capuchins (Cebus apella). Zoo Biology 18: 295–3123.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, AE 1995 Responses of wildlife to noise. In: Knight, RL and Gutzwiller, KJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research pp 109–156. Island Press: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, EL and Bateson, P 2000 Animal welfare and wildlife conservation. In: Gosling, LM and Sutherland, WJ (eds) Behaviour and Conservation pp 330–348. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Brittingham, MC and Temple, SA 1983 Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline? BioScience 33: 31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JS and Kotler, BP 2007 Foraging and the ecology of fear. In: Stephens, DW, Brown, JS and Ydenberg, RC (eds) Foraging pp 397–434. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Brumm, H and Slabbekoorn, H 2005 Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior 35: 151–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, G 1982 Environmental effects of animals used in biomedical research. Biology Reviews 57: 487–523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockrem, JF and Silverin, B 2002 Sight of a predator can stimulate a corticosterone response in the great tit (Parus major). General and Comparative Endocrinology 125: 248–255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crooks, KR and Soulé, ME 1999 Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400: 563–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1980 Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debinski, DM and Holt, RD 2000 A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14: 342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, J and Candolin, C 2007 Human-induced water turbidity alters selection on sexual displays in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology 18: 393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, PW 1991 Transmission modes and the evolution of virulence with special reference to cholera, influenza, and AIDS. Human Nature 2: 1–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, JE and Evans, DR 1998 Cowbirds breeding in the central Appalachians: spatial and temporal patterns and habitat selection. Ecological Applications 8: 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, GW 2000 The evolution of thermal sensitivity in changing environments. In: Storey, KB and Storey, JM (eds) Cell and Molecular Responses to Stress, Volume 1. Environmental Stressors and Gene Responses pp 55–70. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Goymann, W and Wingfield, JC 2004 Allostatic load, social status and stress hormones: the costs of social status matter. Animal Behaviour 67: 591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, JK 1999 Butterfly spatial distribution and habitat requirements in a tropical forest: impacts of selective logging. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, AR and Uhl, G 1997 Fire in Amazonian selectively logged rain forest and the potential for fire reduction. Ecological Applications 7: 713–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, JD, Kirk-Spriggs, AH and Vun Khen, C 1992 The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 335: 425–436Google Scholar
Johnson, CN, Issac, JL and Fisher, DO 2006 Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proceedings of The Royal Society B 274: 341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, ME 2000 Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils. Wildlife Research 27: 289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, RL and Gutzwiller, KJ 1995 Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research. Island Press: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Koolhaas, JM, Korte, SM, De Boer, SF, Van Der Vegt, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Hopster, H, De Jong, IC, Ruis, MAW and Blokhuis, HJ 1999 Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 23: 925–935CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotler, BP and Brown, JS 1988 Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 281–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, RP undated undated USACERL: Champaign, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, WL and Bierregaard, RO Jr 1997 Tropical Forest Remnants. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Lawton, JH, Bignell, DE, Bolton, B, Bloemers, GF, Eggleton, P, Hammond, PM, Hodda, M, Holt, RD, Larsen, TB, Mawdsley, NA, Stork, NE, Srivastava, DS and Watt, AD 1998 Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, SL 1998a Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior 27: 215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, SL 1998b Non-lethal effects in the ecology of predatorprey interactions. BioScience 48: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathevon, N, Aubin, T, Vielliard, J, da Silva, M-L, Sebe, F and Boscolo, D 2008 Singing in the rain forest: how a tropical bird song transfers information. PLoS ONE 3: e1580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, WR and St Clair, CC 2004 The effects of artificial and natural barriers on the movement of small mammals in Banff National Park, Canada. Oikos 105: 397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murton, RK and Wright, EN 1968 The Problem of Birds as Pests. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Norris, DR and Stutchbury, BJM 2002 Sexual differences in gap crossing ability of a forest songbird revealed through radiotracking. Auk 119: 528–532Google Scholar
Pomerantz, GA, Decker, DJ, Goff, GR and Purdy, KG 1988 Assessing impact of recreation on wildlife: a classification scheme. Wildlife Society Bulletin 16: 58–62Google Scholar
Rail, J-F, Darveau, M, Desrochers, A and Huot, J 1997 Territorial responses of boreal forest birds to habitat gaps. Condor 99: 976–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réale, D, Reader, SM, Sol, D, McDougall, PT and Dingemanse, NJ 2007 Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews 82: 1–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripple, WJ and Beschta, RL 2004 Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience 54: 755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, A, Andren, H and Jansson, G 2001 Habitat-mediated predation risk and decision making of small birds at forest edges. Oikos 95: 383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropeik, D and Gray, G 2002 Risk: A Practical Guide for Deciding What's Really Safe and What's Really Dangerous in the World Around You. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
Secondi, J, Aumjaud, A, Pays, O, Boyer, S, Montembault, D and Violleau, D 2007 Water turbidity affects the development of sexual morphology in the palmate newt. Ethology 113:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O, van Alphen, JM and Witte, F 1997 Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A, Bell, AM, Johnson, JC and Ziemba, RE 2004 Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Quarterly Review of Biology 79: 241–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H 2004 Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 3727–3733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbekoorn, H and Smith, TB 2002 Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: An analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56: 1849–1858Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, BR and Blumstein, DT 2008 Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology 19: 448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, TB and Bernatchez, L 2008 Evolutionary change in human-altered environments. Molecular Ecology 17: 1–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamps, JA and Swaisgood, RR 2007 Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 392–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Clair, CC, Bélisle, M, Desrochers, A and Hannon, S 1998 Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Conservation Ecology 2: 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switzer, PV 1993 Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 533–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, JC and Ramenofsky, M 1999 Hormones and the behavioral ecology of stress. In: Balm, PHM (ed) Stress Physiology in Animals pp 1–51. Sheffield Academic Press: Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, JC and Sapolsky, RM 2003 Reproduction and resistance to stress: when and how. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 15: 711–724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed