Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T22:56:55.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural and Physiological Differences Between Silver Foxes Selected and Not Selected for Domestic Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M Harri ,
J Mononen ,
L Ahola ,
I Plyusnina  and
T Rekilä
M Harri
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Finland
J Mononen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Finland
L Ahola
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Finland
I Plyusnina
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Finland Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
T Rekilä*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, Finland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, P O Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland; Jaakko.Mononen@uku.fi
§Present address: Agrifood Research Finland, Fur Farming Research Station, Turkistie 8, FIN-69100 Kannus, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The degree of domestication of an animal is difficult to estimate because the animal's phenotype depends not only on its genetic make-up but also on its experiences during ontogeny. In addition, comparisons between wild and domestic animals suffer from the lack of a proper reference population. In this study, we compared the offspring of silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) that had been selected specifically for tameness for more than 30 generations (NOVO) with normal Finnish farmed foxes (FIN) and with reciprocal hybrids between these two strains. All animals were housed under standard farm conditions without any extra handling. The NOVO foxes had higher domestication indexes and lower fearfulness scores than the FIN foxes, with their hybrids showing values in between. Almost all NOVO foxes started eating in the presence of a human and took a titbit from him, whereas only a few FIN foxes did so. Open field and urinary cortisol tests failed to discriminate between the genotypes. The NOVO cubs had lower levels of serum cortisol both before and after a stressful situation or ACTH injection and showed lower stress-induced hyperthermia than the FIN cubs, with the hybrids showing results in between. NOVO foxes can be used as a reference when developing and validating behavioural tests for use in the selection of less fearful silver foxes. The observed low fear levels and low stress hormone levels suggest better welfare in the NOVO foxes under standard farm conditions.

Keywords

animal welfareattention-seeking behaviourbehavioural testsilver foxstressVulpes vulpes
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , August 2003 , pp. 305 - 314
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Died on 27th January 2001

References

Ahola, L, Harri, M, Kasanen, S, Mononen, J, Pyykönen, T 2000 Effect of family housing of farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in outdoor enclosures on some behavioural and physiological parameters. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakken, M 1992 The relationship between open field activity, competition capacity and first year reproductive success among farmed silver fox cubs (Vulpes vulpes). Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9: 520–528 (Suppl)Google Scholar
Belyaev, D K 1979 Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. The Journal of Heredity 70: 301–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissou, F and Lankin, V 1998 Interspecific differences in fear of humans (domestic behaviour) in farm animals. In: Veisser I and Boissy A (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, 21-25 July 1998, Clermont-Ferrand, France pp 114. International Society for Applied EthologyGoogle Scholar
Dale, O K and Bakken, M 1992 Ein dagleg godbit skader ikkje. Norsk Pelsdyrblad 66: 13–16 [Title translation: A daily titbit does not do any harm]Google Scholar
Daniels, T J and Bekoff, M 1989 Feralisation: the making of wild domestic animals. Behavioural Processes 19: 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1980 Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C S 1941 Temperament: a survey of animal studies. Psychological Bulletin 38: 909–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harri, M, Rekilä, T and Mononen, J 1995 Factor analysis of behavioural tests in farmed silver foxes and blue foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmer, H 1990 Domestication: The Decline of Environmental Appreciation, Edn 2. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Lankin, V 1997 Factors of diversity of domestic behaviour in sheep. Genetics Selection and Evolution 29: 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, R and Bakken, M 1997 Effects of handling and physical restraint on rectal temperature, cortisol, glucose and leucocyte counts in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 38: 29–39Google ScholarPubMed
Oskina, I N 1996 Analysis of the functional state of the pituitary-adrenal axis during postnatal development of domesticated silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Scientifur 20: 159–167Google Scholar
Pedersen, V and Jeppesen, L L 1990 Effect of early handling on later behaviour and stress responses in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1992 Handling of silver foxes at different ages pre-weaning and post-weaning and effects on later behaviour and stress sensitivity. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9: 529–535 (Suppl)Google Scholar
Pedersen, V 1993 Effects of different post-weaning handling procedures on the later behaviour of silver foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1994 Long-term effects of different handling procedures on behavioural, physiological and production-related parameters in silver foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plyusnina, I Z, Oskina, I N and Trut, L N 1991 An analysis of fear and aggression during early development of behaviour in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E O 1999 Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1996 Effect of inside-cage and outside-cage environment on behaviour test performance of blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica (Section A — Animal Science) 46: 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M and Ahola, L 1997 Validation of the feeding test as an index of fear in farmed blue (Alopex lagopus) and silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Physiology & Behavior 62: 805–810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rekilä, T, Ahola, L, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1998 Effect of the environment inside and outside the cage on the activity and behaviour test performance of silver foxes. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M, Jalkanen, L and Mononen, J 1999 Relationship between hyponeophagia and adrenal cortex function in farmed foxes. Physiology & Behavior 65: 779–783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S and Castellan, N J 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
SPSS® 1999 Base 9.0 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Trut, L N 1999 Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. American Scientist 87: 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, L L 1995 Changes in behavioural traits of the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes) under domestication and specific genotype-environment interaction. Scientifur 19: 87–93Google Scholar