Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:12:56.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aggression, behaviour, and animal care among pit bulls and other dogs adopted from an animal shelter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A MacNeil-Allcock
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
NM Clarke
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
RA Ledger
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour & Welfare Consulting, PO Box 45529 Westside RPO, Vancouver, British Columbia V6S 2N5, Canada
D Fraser*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: david.fraser@ubc.ca

Abstract

Pit bull dogs are a focus of concern because of their reputation for aggression toward people and because they may be mistreated by owners who try to promote aggressive behaviour. This study followed 40 pit bulls and 42 similar-sized dogs of other breeds at an animal shelter. Three pit bulls and two dogs of other breeds were euthanised because of aggression toward people at the shelter, and the remaining 77 dogs were re-homed. Of these, one pit bull and ten dogs of other breeds were returned to the shelter because of alleged aggression. For the dogs that were retained for at least two months, owner reports of aggression in various situations (to strangers, to other dogs, etc) were similar for the two groups. Reported care of the two groups was also similar except that pit bulls were more likely to sleep on the owner's bed and more likely to cuddle with the owner. Pit bull adopters were more likely to be under the age of 30, to rent (rather than own) their home, and to be adopting their first dog, perhaps because of a bias against pit bulls among older adopters. The study provided no evidence of greater aggression or poorer care among adopted pit bulls compared to dogs of other breeds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions) 2001 A community approach to dog bite prevention. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 218: 17321749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, JE, Boat, BW, Putnam, FW, Dates, HF and Mahlman, AR 2006 Ownership of high-risk (‘vicious’) dogs as a marker for deviant behaviors: implications for risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 21: 16161634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, DL, Hsu, Y and Serpell, JA 2008 Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 441460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershman, KA, Sacks, JJ and Wright, JC 1994 Which dogs bite? A case-control study of risk factors. Pediatrics 93: 913917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Italy 2009 Ministero della Salute: Ordinanza per la tutela dell'incolumità pubblica dall'aggressione dei cani. Available at: http://www.salute.gov.it/dettaglio/phPrimoPianoNew.jsp?id=224. (Accessed 15 May 2010)Google Scholar
Jagoe, A and Serpell, J 1996 Owner characteristics and interactions and the prevalence of canine behaviour problems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 3142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaassen, B, Buckley, JR and Esmail, A 1996 Does the Dangerous Dogs Act protect against animal attacks: a prospective study of mammalian bites in the Accident and Emergency department. Injury 27: 8991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledger, RA 2000 Owner and dog characteristics: their effects in the success of the owner-dog relationship. Part 1: owner attachment and owner success. Veterinary International 12: 210Google Scholar
Lockwood, R and Rindy, K 1987 Are ‘pit bulls’ different? An analysis of the pit bull terrier controversy. Anthrozoos 1: 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, K and Love, M 2001 Dog bites to humans: demography, epidemiology, injury and risk. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 218: 19231934CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radio Netherlands/Expatica 2008 Dutch agriculture minister scraps pit bull ban. Available at: http://www.expatica. com/nl/news/local_news/Dutch-Agriculture-Minister-scraps-pit-bullban.html. (Accessed 15 May 2010)Google Scholar
Raghavan, M 2008 Fatal dog attacks in Canada, 1990-2007. Canadian Veterinary Journal 49: 577581Google Scholar
Sacks, JJ, Sinclair, L, Gilchrist, J, Golab, GC and Lockwood, R 2000 Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979-1998. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217: 836840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salman, MD, New, JG Jr, Scarlett, JM and Kass, PH 1998 Human and animal factors related to the relinquishment of dogs and cats in 12 selected animal shelters in the USA. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 1: 207226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, C, Reisner, I, Taliaferro, L and Houpt, K 1996 Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 99 cases of aggression between dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 91108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S 1956 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Wells, D 2000 Prevalence of behaviour problems reported by owners of dogs purchased from an animal rescue shelter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 5565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed