Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:01:38.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage–concentrate diets by sheep. 2. Barley and soya bean meal supplementation of hay diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. R. Crabtree
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
G. L. Williams
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Summary

Three levels of soya bean meal (0%, 25% and 50% of the intake of hay dry matter) combined with three levels of pelleted barley (0%, 50% and 100% of the intake of hay dry matter) in a factorial arrangement of treatments were offered to Welsh Mountain ewe lambs receiving hay ad libitum for 14 weeks.

When barley was not given, soya bean meal added at 25% of the hay intake increased hay voluntary intake from 287 g/day to 412 g/day but hay intake was depressed to 339 g/day by a further increase in the level of soya bean meal. When barley was given, soya bean meal did not affect hay intake. With one exception, an increase in barley reduced hay intake, with the result that there were no differences between treatments in the digestible energy intakes of lambs receiving barley at each level of soya bean meal. In general, it was found that an increase in the concentrate allowance (barley + soya bean) reduced hay intake, whereas an increase in the crude protein content of the concentrate increased hay intake. The relationship between live-weight change, metabolizable energy intake and live weight was examined by regression analysis. Although live weight and voluntary intake were unrelated at the start of the experiment, a positive relationship emerged as the experiment progressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Clapperton, J. L. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 19: 511522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. and Martin, A. K. 1966. The heat of combustion of the urine of sheep and cattle in relation to its chemical composition and to diet. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 449460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1966. The extent of differences between six British breeds of sheep in their metabolism, feed intake and utilisation, and resistance to climatic stress. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 283294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. and Wilson, R. S., 1963. The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5: 2742.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract of cows given hay. J. Dairy Res. 33: 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Murdoch, J. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. J. Dairy Res. 33: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, J. R. and Williams, G. L. 1971. The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage-concentrate diets by sheep. 1. Concentrate supplements for hay and straw. Anim. Prod. 13: 7182.Google Scholar
Dickson, I. A. and Walker-Love, J. 1967. The palatability of certain feeding-stuffs and mixtures for Blackface lambs. Anim. Prod. 9: 282 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Donefer, E., Lloyd, L. E. and Crampton, E. W. 1963. Effect of varying alfalfa: barley ratios on energy intake and volatile fatty acid production by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 425428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. 1967. Voluntary intake of low-protein diets by ruminants. 2. Intake of feed by sheep. J. agric. Set, Camb. 69: 383390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. S. 1961. Cellulose digestibility and the rumen. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant (ed. Lewis, D.), pp. 263270. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1962. The effect of type of concentrate on milk production when silage is the only roughage offered to cows. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 17: 268273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1964. Some factors affecting the intake of roughage by sheep. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 19: 316320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourn, D. F. 1967. The intake of conserved forages. In Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc. No. 3, pp. 2028.Google Scholar