Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T22:27:26.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Utilization of the sex-determining region Y gene in beef cattle breeding schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. C. Bishop
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

In mammals ‘maleness’, i.e. the presence of testes, is thought to be controlled by a single gene on the Y chromosome. Recently, a candidate gene termed the SRY (sex-determining region Y) gene has been located. If the SRY gene is the gene causing maleness then a transgenic male with the SRY gene on an autosome would produce a greater proportion of male offspring than a normal male. This would be advantageous in situations where male offspring are more valuable than females. Such transgenic males have a reduced probability of propagating their genotype and an effort has to be made to avoid their extinction. This is at the cost of genetic progress which must be made to enable the transgenics to remain competitive with normal males.

In a simulated beef cattle breeding scheme if half of the annual matings were made to transgenics then after 15 years of selection the transgenic males fell the equivalent of 2·6 years of selection behind males in a traditional herd. If all matings were made to transgenics they fell over 9 years behind. Selection for lean food conversion ratio was considered as an example. After 15 years of selection the gain in biological efficiency from more male offspring outweighed the loss from reduced genetic progress only when more than 0·5 of the bulls used in the breeding scheme were normal males. In practice, the difficulty of maintaining a small population of transgenic males along with other costs not included in the calculations suggest that breeding schemes in beef cattle with an SRY transgene would not be practicable without further technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, S. C., Broadbent, J. S., Kay, R. M., Rigby, I. and Fisher, A. V. 1992. The performance of Hereford × Friesian offspring of bulls selected for lean growth rate and lean food conversion efficiency. Animal Production. In press.Google Scholar
Gubbay, J., Collingnon, J., Koopman, P., Capel, B., Economou, A., Miinsterberg, A., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P. N. and Lovell-Badge, R. 1990. A gene mapping to the sex-determining region of the mouse Y chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature, London 346: 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainan, C. R. E. 1975. Chromosomes of cattle: present clinical status and promise. Veterinary Record 96: 148151.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1977. Variation in response to selection. Proceedings of the international conference on quantitative genetics (eds. Pollak, E., Kempthorne, O. and Bailey, I. B.), pp. 343365.Google Scholar
Mrode, R. A., Thompson, R. and Smith, C. 1990. Selection for lean growth rate and the efficiency of lean growth in Hereford cattle. 1. Direct responses to selection. Animal Production 51: 2334.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. H., Berta, P., Palmer, M. S., Ross Hawkins, J., Griffiths, B. L., Smith, M. J., Foster, J. W., Frischauf, A-M, Lovell-Badge, R. and Goodfellow, P. N. 1990. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature, London 346: 240244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, St C. S. 1982. Theory of growth and feed efficiency in relation to maturity in body weight. Proceedings of the 2nd world congress in genetics applied to livestock production, Vol. V, pp. 218230.Google Scholar