Skip to main content Accessibility help

Subpopulations and accuracy of prediction in pig carcass classification

  • B. Engel (a1), W. G. Buist (a1), M. Font i Furnols (a2) and E. Lambooij (a1)


Classification of pig carcasses in the European Community (EC) is based on the lean meat percentage of the carcasses. The lean meat percentage is predicted from instrumental carcass measurements, such as fat and muscle depth measurements, obtained in the slaughterline. The prediction formula for an instrument is derived from the data of a dissection experiment. When the relationship between percentage lean and instrumental carcass measurements differs between subpopulations, such as sexes or breeds, accuracy of prediction may differ between these subpopulations. In particular for some subpopulations predicted lean meat percentages may be systematically too low and for other subpopulations systematically too high. Producers or buyers that largely specialize in subpopulations where the percentage lean is underestimated, are put at a financial disadvantage.

The aim of this paper is to gain insight, on the basis of real data, into the effects of differences between subpopulations on the accuracy of the predicted percentage lean meat of pig carcasses. A simulation study was performed based on data from dissection trials in The Netherlands, comprising gilts and castrated males, and trials in Spain, comprising different genetic types. The possible gain in accuracy, i.e. reduction of prediction bias and mean squared prediction error, by the use of separate prediction formulae for (some of) the subpopulations was determined.

We concluded that marked bias in the predicted percentage lean meat may occur between subpopulations when a single overall prediction formula is employed. Systematic differences in predicted percentage lean between subpopulations that are overestimated and underestimated may exceed 4% and for selected values of instrumental measurements may run up to 6%. Bias between subpopulations may be eliminated, and prediction accuracy may be markedly improved, when separate prediction formulae are used. With the use of separate formulae the root mean squared prediction error may be reduced by 13 to 26% of the expected value when a single prediction formula is used for all pig carcasses.

These are substantial reductions on a national scale. This suggests that there will be a commercial interest in the use of separate prediction formulae for different subpopulations. In the near future, when the use of implants becomes more reliable, subpopulations will be recognized automatically in the slaughterline and use of different prediction formulae will become practically feasible. Some possible consequences for the EC regulations and national safeguards for quality of prediction formulae are discussed.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Causeur, D. J. and Dhorne, T. J. 1998. Finite sample properties of a multivariate extension of double regression. Biometrics 54: 15911601.
Cox, D. R. and Snel, E. J. 1989. Analysis of binary data, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
Daumas, G., Causeur, D., Dhorne, T. and Schollhammer, E. 1998. The new pig carcass grading methods in France. Proceedings of the 44th ICoMST, Barcelona, Spain.
Daumas, G., Dhorne, T. and Gispert, M. 1994. Accounting for the sex effect on prediction of pig carcass lean meat percentage in the Community. Proceedings of the fourth ICoMST, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Engel, B., Buist, W. G., Walstra, P., Olsen, E. and Daumas, G. 2003. Accuracy of prediction of percentage lean meat and authorization of carcass measurement instruments: adverse effects of incorrect sampling of carcasses in pig classification. Animal Science 76: 199209.
Engel, B. and Walstra, P. 1991a. Increasing precision or reducing expense in regression experiments by using information from a concomitant variable. Biometrics 47: 1320.
Engel, B. and Walstra, P. 1991b. A simple method to increase precision or reduce expense in regression experiments to predict the proportion of lean meat of carcasses. Animal Production 53: 353359.
Engel, B. and Walstra, P. 1993. Accounting for subpopulations in prediction of the proportion of lean meat of pig carcasses. Animal Production 57: 147152.
European Commission. 1988. Commission decision authorizing methods for grading pig carcases in Spain (88/479/ EEC).
European Commission. 1994. Commission decision amendment to the decision authorizing methods for grading pig carcases in Spain (94/337/EEC).
European Community. 1989a. EC document VI/3860/89, proposal for research concerning the harmonisation of methods for grading pigs in the Community.
European Community. 1989b. EC decision no. 89/53/CEE related to the approval of classification methods of pig carcasses in Italy.
European Community. 1994. EC regulation no. 3127/94, amending regulation (EC) no. 2967/85 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses.
EUPIGCLASS. 2000. Standardisation of pig carcass classification in the EU through improved statistical procedures and new technological developments. Program funded under the Growth Programme. www. cordis. lu/en/home. html
GenStat Committee. 2000. The guide to GenStat (ed. Payne, R.). VSN International Ltd, Oxford.
Gispert, M., Dhorne, T., Diestre, A. and Daumas, G. 1996. Efecto del sexo en la predicción del contenido en magro de la canal porcina en Espana, Francia y Paises Bajos. Investigación Agraria, Producción y Sanidad Animales 11: 1928.
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
Walstra, P. 1986. Assessment of the regression formula for estimation of the lean meat percentage by HGP-measurements in The Netherlands. EC working paper, Brussels VI/4849/86.
Walstra, P. and Merkus, G. S. M. 1996. Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Research report 96·014 Institute for Animal Science and Health, (ID-Lelystad), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Animal Science
  • ISSN: 1357-7298
  • EISSN: 1748-748X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed