Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Results of multivariate individual animal model genetic evaluations of british pedigree beef cattle

  • R. E. Crumps (a1), G. Simm (a1), D. Nicholson (a2), R. H. Findlay (a2), J. G. E. Bryan (a3) and R. Thompson (a2)...

Abstract

This paper reports the procedures put into place in the UK for the genetic evaluation of pedigree beef cattle and estimation of genetic trends using a comprehensive model to allow critical analysis of progress made under previous data recording schemes. Live weights of Simmental, Limousin, Charolais, South Devon and Aberdeen Angus beef cattle, recorded by the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) from 1970 to 1992 were analysed, as part of a project to introduce best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) of breeding value in the British beef industry. Birth weights were available from MLC or the relevant breed society, (4000 to 84000 records, depending on the breed) and 200- and 400-day weights were estimated by within-animal linear regression on all available weights (resulting in 8000 to 48000 records per breed). Animals were retrospectively assigned to contemporary groups within herds, separately for each trait, taking account of observed calving patterns. Records were adjusted to correct for heterogeneity of variance between herds. BLUP evaluations were then performed within breed, fitting a multivariate individual animal model. In addition to additive direct genetic effects, additive maternal genetic and dam permanent environmental effects were included for birth weight and 200-day weight. Unknown parents were assigned to genetic groups, based on estimated date of birth. The model included fixed effects for contemporary group, sex, month of birth, birth type (single or multiple), embryo transfer births, fostered calves, breed of dam, proportion purebred and age of dam. Genetic trends were estimated by regressing estimated breeding values for animals on their year of birth. Trends in birth weight, 200-day weight and 400-day weight between 1970 and 1992 were approximately 0·09, 0·73 and 1·38 kg per annum respectively for the Charolais breed; 0·08, 0·76 and 1·33 kg per annum for the Simmental; 0·06, 0·53 and 0·89 kg per annum for the Limousin; 0·12, 1·02 and 1·86 kg per annum for the Aberdeen Angus; and 0·03, 0·38 and 0·82 kg per annum for the South Devon breed.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Allen, D. M. and Steane, D. E. 1985. Beef selection indices. British Cattle Breeders' Club Digest, no. 40, pp. 6370.
Andersen, B. B., Baerdemaeker, A., de Bittante, G., Bonaiti, B., Colleau, J. J., Fimland, E., Jansen, J., Lewis, W. H. E., Politiek, R. D., Seeland, G., Teehan, T. J. and Werkmeister, F. 1981. Performance testing of bulls in AI: report of a working group of the Commission of Cattle Production. Livestock Production Science 8:101119.
Baker, R. L., Wickham, B. W. and Morris, C. A. 1982. The accuracy of central bull performance tests in New Zealand as evaluated by subsequent progeny testing. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Madrid, vol. VIII, pp. 300304.
Benyshek, L. L. and Bertrand, J. K. 1990. National genetic improvement programmes in the United States beef industry. South African Journal of Animal Science 20:103109.
Brotherstone, S. H. and Hill, W. G. 1986. Heterogeneity of variance amongst herds for milk production. Animal Production 42: 297303.
Carabano, M. J. and Alenda, R. 1990. Serving several species with animal models. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XIII, pp. 394399.
Crump, R. E., Wray, N. R., Thompson, R. and Simm, G. 1997. Assigning pedigree beef performance records to contemporary groups taking account of within-herd calving patterns. Animal Science 65:193198.
De Roo, G. and Fimland, E. A. 1983. A genetic analysis of performance and progeny test data for young bulls of Norwegian Red cattle and various Friesian crosses. Livestock Production Science 10:123131.
Graser, H.-U. and Hammond, K. 1985. Mixed model procedures for the Australian beef industry. I. Multiple-trait model for estimation of breeding values for 200-day and final weights of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36:527535.
Graser, H.-U., Hammond, K. and McClintock, A. E. 1984. Genetic trends in Australian Simmental. Proceedings of the fourth conference of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, pp. 8687.
Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Proceedings of the animal breeding and genetics symposium in honor ofDrJ. L. Lush. American Society of Animal Sciences and American Dairy Sciences Association, Champaign, Illinois, pp.1040.
Henderson, C. R. and Quaas, R. L. 1976. Multiple trait evaluation using relatives' records, journal of Animal Science 43:11881197.
Lewis, W. H. E. 1992. Beef index validation — national results from suckler cows. British Cattle Breeders' Club digest, no. 47, pp. 2427.
Mohiuddin, G. 1993. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters of some performance traits in beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 61:495522.
Mrode, R. A. 1988. Selection experiments in beef cattle. 2. A review of responses and correlated responses. Animal Breeding Abstracts 56:155167.
Quaas, R. L. 1988. Additive genetic model with groups and relationships, journal of Dairy Science 71: (suppl. 2) 9198.
Rose, E. P. de and Wilton, J. W. 1988. Estimation of genetic trends for Canadian station-tested beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68:4956.
Sasaki, Y. 1992. The effectiveness of the best linear unbiased prediction of beef sires using field data collected from small farms, journal of Animal Science 70: 33173321.
Schaeffer, L. R. and Wilton, J. W. 1987. RAM computing strategies and multiple traits. Proceedings of the conference on genetic evaluation of beef cattle, Kansas City, pp. 2549.
Simm, G., Smith, C. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1985. Environmental effects on bull performance test results. Animal Production 41:177185.
Simm, G., Steane, D. E. and Wray, N. R. 1990. Developments in beef cattle breeding programmes in Europe. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XV, pp. 231243.
Smith, C, Steane, D. E. and Jordan, C. 1979. Progeny test results on Hereford bulls weight-recorded on the farm. Animal Production 28:4953.
Southgate, J. R., Cook, G. L. and Kempster, A. J. 1982. A comparison of different breeds and crosses from the suckler herd. 1. Live-weight growth and efficiency of food utilization. Animal Production 35: 8798.
Thompson, R. 1986. Estimation of realized heritability in a selected population using mixed model methods. Genetique, Selection, Evolution 18:475484.
Thompson, R., Wray, N. R. and Crump, R. E. 1994. Calculation of prediction error variances using sparse matrix methods. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 111: 102109.
Westell, R. A., Quaas, R. L. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1988. Genetic groups in an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 71:13101318.
Wiggans, G. R. 1990. Breeding value prediction with the animal model. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XIII, pp. 355356.
Wilson, D. E., Willham, R. L. and Berger, P. J. 1985. Mixed model methodology for unifying within-herd and national beef sire evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 61: 814824.

Keywords

Results of multivariate individual animal model genetic evaluations of british pedigree beef cattle

  • R. E. Crumps (a1), G. Simm (a1), D. Nicholson (a2), R. H. Findlay (a2), J. G. E. Bryan (a3) and R. Thompson (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed