Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:22:49.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between volume of rumen contents and genetic susceptibility to pasture bloat in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. R. M. Cockrem ,
J. T. McIntosh ,
R. D. McLaren  and
C. A. Morris
F. R. M. Cockrem
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
J. T. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
R. D. McLaren
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
C. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Experiments were designed to exchange rumen contents and vary the volumes of rumen contents between two pairs of rumen fistulated cows from herds selected for high (HS) or low (LS) susceptibility o t bloat. After exchanges between HS and LS cows the animals were tested on bloat-potent lucerne. The volume of rumen contents was lower in LS than in HS cows by 3·05 1. Increasing the volume of rumen contents of LS cows caused them to bloat to a degree never previously attained. The degree of bloat (i.e. score) was related to the volume of rumen fluid (r = 0·71) regardless of its origin (HS or LS) or the susceptibility of the recipient cow. The results implied that LS cows from this selection experiment did not bloat because they had a lower relative volume of rumen digesta than HS cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , August 1987 , pp. 43 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, R. T. J. and Reid, C. S. W. 1970. Legume bloat. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 599–606. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. T. J. and Reid, C. S. W. 1974. Foamy bloat of cattle. A review. Journal of Dairy Science 57: 753–785.Google Scholar
Cockrem, F. R. M., McIntosh, J. T. and McLaren, R. D. 1983. Selection for and against susceptibility to bloat in dairy cows—a review. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43: 101–106.Google Scholar
Cockrem, F. R. M., McIntosh, J. T., McLaren, R. D. and Morris, C. A. 1987. In vitro gas and foam production by rumen fluid from cows of genetically high or low susceptibility to pasture bloat. Animal Production 45: 37–42.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. and Terry, R. A. 1955. Bloat investigations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 46: 257–266.Google Scholar
Lippke, H., Reaves, J. L. and Jacobson, N. L. 1972. Rumen pressures associated with the scores of a bloat severity scale. Journal of Animal Science 34: 171–175.Google Scholar
Mendel, V. E. and Boda, J. M. 1961. Physiological studies of the rumen with emphasis on the animal factors associated with bloat. Journal of Dairy Science 44: 1881–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar