Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:17:37.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to examine the effects on the intake and performance of calves of supplementing a diet, based on high-digestibility, well-preserved grass silage, with fish meal. The effects of fish-meal supplementation were examined at each of two amounts of concentrate intake (1·05 and 2·2 kg/day) in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Fish meal was offered at a rate of 75 g/kg silage dry-matter (DM) intake. Experiments 1 and 2 involved 36 and 40 castrated male calves, respectively, which were initially 7 weeks old and had a live weight of 70 kg. The treatments were imposed for 20 weeks. The silages used in the two experiments had mean concentrations of 22-8 g nitrogen (N) per kg DM; 524 g protein N per kg total N; 59 g ammonia N per kg total N; 0·4 g butyric acid per kg DM; and 712 g digestible organic matter per kg DM. The concentrate consisted of (g/kg) 800 ground barley, 125 soya bean meal, 50 molasses and 25 mineral and vitamin supplement, respectively, and contained 29 g N per kg DM. Silage DM intakes and live-weight gains for the low and high amounts of concentrate supplementation were 1·93 and 1·46 (s.e. 0·055) kg/day and 0·84 and 1·01 (s.e. 0·013) kg/day respectively. The supplement of fish meal did not affect silage DM intake or animal performance for either concentrate intake. Proportionately, only 0·21 of the difference in live weight at the end of the treatment periods between the two amounts of concentrate intake remained at slaughter at 18 months of age. It is concluded that the optimum growth rate for autumn-born calves during their first winter can be sustained by a diet of high-digestibility grass silage supplemented with a maximum of 1·0 kg cereal-soya bean meal concentrate and that no response in performance was obtained to supplementation of this diet with fish meal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 293 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 121–181. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Suppl. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Allen, D. M. and Kilkenny, B. 1984. Beef production from dairy-bred calves. In Planned Beef Production. 2nd ed., pp. 131–173. Granada, London.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Gibb, M. J. and Young, N. E. 1984. Fat and protein retention by steers on silage-based diets and subsequent performance at grass. Proc. 7th Silage Conf, Belfast, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Gill, M. S. and Watson, J. N. 1981. Silage and milk production: a comparison between long, chopped and ground hays as supolements to silage of high digestibility. Grass Forage Set. 36: 91–96.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1976. Silage and milk production. A comparison between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 191–195.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. S., Bax, J. A. and Offer, N. W. 1982. Protein supplementation of calves given grass silage ad libitum. Anim. Prod. 34: 382 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Chapple, D. G. 1983. Protein supplementation for calves on silage diets. Anim. Prod. 36: 513 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congr., Helsinki, pp. 445–453.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P. 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. and Gibson, Q. H. 1954. The estimation of lactic acid using eerie sulphate. Biochem. J. 58: 154–158.Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R. 1981. Silage supplements for calves. Anim. Prod. 32: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R., Thomas, C. and Gill, Margaret. 1979. The effect of supplementation of grass silage with fish meal on intake and performance by British Friesian calves. Anim. Prod. 28: 423 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gill, Margaret and England, P. 1981. The effect of type of protein supplement on voluntary intake and nitrogen retention in calves given grass silage. Anim. Prod. 32: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gill, Margaret and England, P. 1983. The effect of level of fish meal and sucrose supplementation on the voluntary intake of silage and live-weight gain in young cattle. Anim. Prod. 36: 513 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hughes, J. and Chalmers, J. S. 1983. Protein supplementation of calves offered silage. Anim. Prod. 36: 537 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Beef carcase grading and classification. In Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing, pp. 163–201. Granada, St Albans.Google Scholar
Ochoa, C. and Owen, E. 1983. Energy and protein supplementation of grass silage for Friesian steers: effect on performance from 2 to 7 months of age and on subsequent compensatory growth. Anim. Prod. 36: 536 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1981. Amino acid requirements for lactation in high-yielding dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 33–65. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. and Ochoa, C. 1982. Energy and protein supplementation of grass silage for Friesian steers: effect on performance from 4 to 7 months of age and on subsequent compensatory growth. Anim. Prod. 34: 387–388 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Anim. Prod. 38: 171–179.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gibbs, B. G., Aston, K. and Tayler, J. C. 1980. Some factors influencing the performance of beef cattle given silage. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 11, pp. 383–387.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gill, M. and Austin, A. R. 1980. The effect of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on voluntary intake of silage by calves. Grass Forage Sci. 35: 275–279.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., No. 6, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1982. The utilization of silage protein. In Forage Protein Conservation and Utilization, Commission of European Communities Seminar, Dublin, pp. 121–145.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. 1978. Ensiled forages and their utilization by ruminants. Proc. 3rd Wld Congr. Anim. Prod. Madrid. Vol. 1, pp. 403–412.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. 1980. Estimation of “true” protein in herbages and conserved feeds. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 11, pp. 323–326.Google Scholar