Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:05:49.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic aspects of growth and carcass quality in veal calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. M. Hinks  and
B. Bech Andersen
C. J. M. Hinks
Affiliation:
Cattle Section, Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
B. Bech Andersen
Affiliation:
Cattle Section, Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access

Extract

Five hundred and ten Danish Red male calves slaughtered for the production of veal at live weights of approximately 200 kg were used to estimate carcass composition.

Regression coefficients expressing the relationships between live weight and carcass components indicated that weight at 6 months of age consisted mostly of muscle development in the breast and hindquarters.

Variation in all of the more important growth and carcass attributes was very small, which suggested that selection responses would be difficult to obtain.

There was no apparent correlation between growth rate and the muscle, fat and bone components of the carcass. The best single indicator of the muscle content of the carcass was the muscle content of the pistol cut (r = 0·79), which itself involved complicated dissection procedures. The longissimus dorsi area provided relatively little information, and none of the body measurements, apart from the leg circumference, were strongly related to carcass composition.

The predictive value of many combinations of traits was examined. The best of them accounted for 90% of the variation in muscle content, but when the pistol cut was excluded, none of the multiple correlation coefficients exceeded 0·8.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , August 1968 , pp. 331 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, P. E. and Larsen, Brolund. 1964. Produktion af Sødmælkskalve. BP Nyhedstjeneste 45: 1–15.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1966. Muscle: bone ratio and fat percentage as measures of beef carcass composition. Anim. Prod. 8:1–11.Google Scholar
Buttereteld, R. M. 1965. The relationship of carcass measurements and dissection data to beef carcass composition. Res. vet. Sci. 6: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, E. P., Timon, V. M. and Broderick, T. 1966. Genetic and environmental parameters of growth and carcass traits in dual purpose cattle. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Neimann-SØRensen, A., Nielsen, E. O. and Legates, J. E. 1965. The inter-relation between growth, body measurements and the carcass quality and meat characteristics in the production of veal calves. World Rev. Anim. Prod. Special Issue 1: 41–44.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. O. 1962. Afkomsprøver med Tyre, XVI. Beretning fra Forsøgslaboratoriet, No. 329, København.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. O. 1964. Afkomsprøver med Tyre, XVIII. Beretning fra Forsøgslaboratoriet. No. 342, København.Google Scholar
Woolf, B. 1951. Computation and interpretation of multiple regressions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 13: 100–119.Google Scholar