Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:47:04.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutrition of artificially reared lambs 2. The effect of feed restriction at three stages of growth on growth and carcass composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Lambs weaned from the ewe at 2 days of age were fed ad libitum or restricted in each of three periods of growth to a slaughter weight of 35 kg according to a factorial design. Restriction in the milk-feeding period was achieved by reducing the milk allowance (6·4 kg v. 13·6 kg of milk replacer) and after weaning, by restricting the daily allowance of feed.

Restriction of the milk allowance reduced early growth but the effect was partly offset by the higher concentrate consumption of restricted lambs. There was also a tendency for lambs restricted in the milk period to eat more and grow faster when subsequently fed ad libitum. Performance after 15 kg on a diet containing no protein of animal origin was poor and the level of restriction was severe. Overall growth and efficiency from 15 to 35 kg were considerably reduced by any degree of restriction. However, there was no evidence that restriction in the middle period of growth had any effect on the performance of lambs fed ad libitum in the final period. Although carcass weight was not affected by treatment at any stage, restriction in the milk-feeding period and feeding ad libitum from 15 to 25 kg resulted in a greater weight of head, liver, heart and lungs (weighed together). Chemical analysis of the whole minced carcass showed that restriction of milk intake had a significant effect in reducing the carcass dry-matter content. There was also a trend towards a higher energy and fat content of the dry matter. Restriction in the final period increased the protein content of the carcass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crampton, E. W. and Harris, L. E. 1969. Applied Animal Nutrition. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., McDonald, I. and Fowler, V. R. 1964. The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcasses of pigs and lambs when variation in fat content are excluded. Anim. Prod. 6: 141154.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Calder, A. F. C. and Smith, H. 1959. The early weaning of pigs. 6. The effects of early weaning and various growth curves before 50 lb liveweight upon subsequent performance and carcass quality. J. agric. Sd., Camb. 53: 136144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. 1960. The composition of food. Medical Research Council, Special Report No. 297.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L. 1968. Crude protein requirement of intensively fed lambs. Anim. Prod. 10: 243 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1970. Manual of Nutrition. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. A. and Owen, J. B. 1972. The nutrition of artificially reared lambs. 1. The effect of different feeding methods applied at three stages of growth. Anim. Prod. 15: 285292.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R. and Ridgman, W. J. 1969. The effect of varying the quantity and distribution of liquid feed in lambs reared artificially. Anim. Prod. 11: 19.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H., Wellington, G. H. and Wood, J. D. 1968. Present status of various methods of estimating body composition. Proc. Recipr. Meat Conf., Amer. Meat Sci. Assoc. p. 82.Google Scholar
Yates, F. 1933. The analysis of replicated experiments when the field results are incomplete. Emp. J. Exptl Agric. 1: 129142.Google Scholar
Yates, F. 1964. The Design and Analysis of Factorial Experiments. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar