Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:55:17.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutrition of artificially reared lambs 1. The effect of different feeding methods applied at three stages of growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Lambs weaned from the ewe at 2 days of age were fed liberally or on a restricted level in each of three periods of growth according to a factorial design. In the first period restriction was achieved by giving less milk (5 as against 9 kg of milk replacer) and in the later periods by diluting one of the diets with 40% oat husks.

Milk restriction had no effect on performance from 15 to 35 kg or on the carcass composition as determined by dissection into fat, lean and bone. However, in the separate stages, 15·25 kg and 25·35 kg there was some indication that previous restriction of milk affected subsequent dry-matter intake and growth, particularly in the middle period of growth in lambs given the low energy diet.

Restriction after 15 kg, particularly from 15 to 25 kg, reduced overall performance to slaughter at 35 kg but had little effect on dissected carcass components. Restriction in the middle period affected performance in the final period and reduced food conversion efficiency. It is calculated that milk allowances for artificially reared lambs can be reduced without much effect on subsequent performance particularly where good diets are self-fed after 15 kg.

Restriction after 15 kg can be achieved by diet dilution but it has no apparently beneficial effect on carcass quality, as in pigs, and particularly if applied soon after 15 kg has been reached, can severely reduce growth and efficiency of feed conversion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, R. P., Kay, M. and Ørskov, E. R. 1969. The effect of different dietary energy concentrations on the voluntary intake and growth of intensively fed lambs. Anim. Prod. 11: 173187.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P. and Ørskov, E. R. 1970. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. I. The influence of protein concentration and feeding level on rate of gain in body weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. P. and Ørskov, E. R. 1970. The effect of dietary protein concentration, feeding level and sex on body composition at two liveweights. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Harris, L. E. 1969. Applied Animal Nutrition. W. H. Freeman and Co, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. 1965. The effect of concentration of milk substitute on the performance of artificially reared lambs. Anim. Prod. 7: 325332.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. I. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R., Miller, E. L. and Ridgman, W. J. 1967. The intensive rearing of lambs. II. Voluntary food intake and performance on diets of varying oat husk and beef tallow content. Anim. Prod. 9: 509520.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R. and Ridgman, W. J. 1969a. The effect of varying the quantity and distribution of liquid feed in lambs reared artificially. Anim. Prod. 11: 19.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R. and Ridgman, W. J. 1969b. The control of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Anim. Prod. 11: 511520.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. 1972. Increasing the reproductive rate of sheep. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Versailles.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. and Verges, J. B. 1952. Effect of plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. I. The effect of high and low planes of nutrition at different ages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. and Verges, J. B. 1952. Effect of plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. II. Effects on lambs of 30 lb carcass weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 93149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Osbourn, D. F. 1960. Compensatory growth after under-nutrition in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. 35: 324363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar