Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:41:00.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nursing and suckling behaviour of sows and their litters before and after grouping in multi-accommodation pens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Bryant  and
P. Rowlinson
M. J. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
P. Rowlinson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT
Get access

Abstract

Two groups of six sows and their litters were observed continuously the day before (day 19 post partum) and the 2 days following (days 20 and 21) movement from individual farrowing crates to multiaccommodation pens. Grouping was associated with a decline in the frequency of true nursing events, particularly in the 6-h period immediately following grouping, and with an increase in the number of false nursing events. There was a trend for a reduction in the duration of the milk let-down phase of the suckling sequence in four litters studied in detail and cross suckling was observed in all four litters. Lactational oestrus occurred in nine of the 12 sows. The study yielded little evidence for an association between nursing and suckling behaviour, and the occurrence of lactational oestrus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 277 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bryant, M. J., Rowlinson, P. and Van der steen, H. A. M. 1983. A comparison of the nursing and suckling behaviour of group- and individually-housed sows and their litters. Anim. Prod. 36: 445–451.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. B. 1970. The induction of pregnancy during lactation in the sow. J. Reprod. & Fen. 15: 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. B. and Lamming, G. E. 1969. The lactational anoestrus of the sow: the status of the anterior pituitary-ovarian system during lactation and after weaning. J. Endocr. 43: 507–509.Google Scholar
Duggan, R. T., Bryant, M. J. and Cunningham, F. J. 1982. Gonadotrophin, total oestrogen and progesterone concentrations in the plasma of lactating sows with particular reference to lactational oestrus. J. Reprod. & Fert. 64: 303–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillyer, M. 1976. Suckling sows in groups. Pig Fmg 26 (6): 52–53.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. 1978. Reproduction during lactation. In Control of Ovulation (ed. Crighton, D. B.. Foxcroft, G. R., Haynes, N. B. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 335–353. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvizi, N., Elsaesser, F., Smidt, D. and Ellendorff, F. 1976. Plasma luteinizing hormone and progesterone in the adult female pig during the oestrous cycle, late pregnancy and lactation, and after ovariectomy and pentobarbitone treatment. J. Endocr. 69: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petchey, A. M., Dodsworth, T. L. and English, P. R. 1978. The performance of sows and litters penned individually or grouped in late lactation. Anim. Prod. 27: 215–221.Google Scholar
Peters, J. B., First, N. L. and Casida, L. E. 1969. Effects of pig removal and oxytocin injections on ovarian activity and pituitary changes in mammillectomized post partum sows. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlinson, P., Boughton, H. G. and Bryant, M. J. 1975. Mating of sows during lactation: observations from a commercial unit. Anim. Prod. 21: 233–241.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1981. Lactational oestrus in the sow. 1. The effect of the interval between farrowing and grouping on the incidence and timing of lactational oestrus in sows. Anim. Prod. 32: 315–323.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P. and Bryant, M. J. 1982. Lactational oestrus in the sow. 2. The influence of group-housing, boar presence and feeding level upon the occurrence of oestrus in lactating sows. Anim. Prod. 34: 283–290.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P., Baldwin, B. A., Fraser, D. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1975. The behaviour of swine. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals. 3rd ed. (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 295–329. Bailliere Tindall. London.Google Scholar
Smith, D. M. 1961. The effect of daily separation of sows from their litters upon milk yield, creep intake and energetic efficiency. N. Z. Jl agric. Res. 4: 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Landeghem, A. A. J. and Van de Wiel, D. F. M. 1978. Radioimmunoassay for porcine prolactin: plasma levels during lactation, suckling and weaning and after TRH administration. Ada endocr., Copenh. 88: 653–667.Google Scholar