Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:52:24.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the value and methods of correcting milk records for calving interval or days dry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Susan Brotherstone
Susan Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Get access

Extract

In formulating a genetic index for use in cow and sire evaluation, there is a need to account for all environmental factors which influence an animal's yield. To this end, milk production records are currently adjusted for, amongst other things, age at calving and month of calving. In Norway, Sweden and West Germany, records are corrected for calving interval, i.e. the number of days between subsequent calvings (Philipsson, Dommerholt, Fimland, Gaillard, Gjøl-Christensen, Lederer, McClintock and Mocquot, 1978), but in Britain no account is taken of calving interval or days dry. Analysis has shown (McClintock, 1982) that both these factors have a significant effect on yield, and hence further investigation into the value and methods of adjusting for these factors was required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 322 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Colombus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
McClintock, A. E. 1982. The associations between calving interval, days dry and lactation yields of Friesians. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, Vol. 8, pp. 32–36. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar
Miller, P., Van Vleck, L. D. and Henderson, C. R. 1967. Relationship among herd life, milk production, and calving interval. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 1283–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipsson, J., Dommerholt, J., Fimland, E., Gaillard, C., Gjøl-Christensen, L., Lederer, J., McClintock, A. E. and Mocouot, J. C. 1978. Problems in cow evaluation and current use of cow index. Report of a working group on cowevaluation. Livestock Production Science 5: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. and Henderson, C. R. 1972. Effect of days dry and days open on Holstein milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. 1985. Importance of the calving interval to milk yield in the following lactation of British Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Research 52: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar