Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T09:01:58.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the use of impedance measurements for the prediction of carcass composition in lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. R. Cosgrove ,
J. W. B. King  and
D. A. Brodie
J. R. Cosgrove
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Liaison Unit, Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
J. W. B. King
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Liaison Unit, Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D. A. Brodie
Affiliation:
School of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
Get access

Abstract

The absence of a simple, accurate method of lamb carcass composition assessment presents difficulties in satisfying an increasing consumer demand for leaner meat. Present carcass classification methods, depending on visual appraisal by trained personnel, may be perceived as subjective and consequently little support for the scheme is found within the industry. Ten carcasses of varying weight (19·9 (s.d. 5·9) kg) and side concentration of fat (303·61 (s.d. 102·70) g/kg) were assessed for impedance to the flow of an alternating current (800μΛ at 50Hz) by use of an impedance analyser. Impedance measurements were highly repeatable (> 0·90) and prediction equations for side concentration of fat and lean produced residual s.d.s of 23·25 to 18·80 g/kg and 37·10 to 18·55 g/kg respectively. Impedance measurements may provide an inexpensive, accurate and simple means of assessing lamb carcass composition

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cutherbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation – to assess beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1: 113–122.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. T., Martin, A. H. and Sather, A. P. 1979. Evaluation of an electronic technique for measuring lean content of the live pig. Journal of Animal Science 48: 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffer, E. C., Meador, C. K. and Simpson, D. C. 1969. Correlation of whole body impedance with total body water volume. Journal of Applied Physiology 27: 531–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyal, S. M., Jones, S. D. M. and Kennedy, B. W. 1987. Evaluation of electronic meat-measuring equipment in predicting carcass composition in the live pig. Animal Production 45: 97–102.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Chadwick, J. P., Cue, R. I. and Grantley-smith, M. 1985. The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes. Meat Science 16: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Jones, D. W. and Wolf, B. T. 1986. A comparison of alternative methods for predicting the carcass composition of crossbred lambs of different breeds and crosses. Meal Science 18: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, R. M. and Varnadore, W. L. 1976. Use of electronic meat measuring equipment to measure cutout yield of beef carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 43: 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. Genstat V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamstead Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Lukaski, H. C., Johnson, P. E., Bolonchuck, W. W. and Lykken, G. I. 1985. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements for the human body. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 41: 810–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1987. Sheep Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar