Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T19:25:29.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the theoretical relation between the fractions of maturity of organs and of the whole animal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. R. Parks
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006 Australia
Get access

Abstract

A general parabola constrained to pass through points (0,0) and (1,1) yields a linear one parameter (q) function which can be used to relate the fraction of maturity of organs or masses of tissue to the fraction of maturity of the whole animal. This is an empirical approach. It is often preferable to derive a function from a theory of the phenomenon under study. A theory of feeding and growth of animals is used to derive a non-linear one parameter (k) function which can be used to study the same data to which the linear q-function is applicable. The parameter, k is directly proportional to the fraction of total nutrients consumed by the animal which is allocated to the organ as the animal ages. If the fraction of nutrient allocated remains constant, the parameter k is constant and has the same properties as the parameter q. However there is nothing in the theory which constrains k to be constant, therefore, the q-function is of more general use than the q-function in the study of the relationship of the fraction of maturity of organs to that of the whole animal. Two cases are presented to illustrate this generality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterfield, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M.Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Anim. Prod. 36: 2937.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1950. Physiological meaning of regression equations. J. appl. Physiol. 3: 417423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1982. A Theory of Feeding and Growth of Animals. Chap. 3. Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences, 11. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J. M. 1949. Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards and their relations to spurious correlation. J. appl. Physiol. 2: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed