Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:11:41.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the prevention of nutritional muscular dystrophy by winter silage feeding of the cow or selenium implantation of the calf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Hidiroglou
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K. J. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
J. M. Wauthy
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
J. E. Proulx
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Get access

Summary

Thirty-four pregnant Shorthorn cows were fed during the winter either grass silage from first crop material or rapeseed silage, both low in selenium content (less than 33 nanogram/g DM). Serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGOT) determinations were performed before and after the calves went to the pasture. There was no evidence either clinically, biochemically (SGOT) or at post-mortem examination, of any nutritional muscular dystrophy (NMD) disorder in the 34 calves, despite very low plasma selenium levels (4 to 5 ng/ml plasma).

An implantation technique using a slow-release selenium pellet also was evaluated as a means of controlling the disease. Fifteen calves from a total of 33 calves born to cows given a dystrophy-producing hay during the winter, were implanted a few days after birth with a pellet containing 15 mg of selenium. Four out of 18 calves in the control group showed clinical symptoms of NMD and two died with NMD lesions. SGOT levels in the implanted calves were normal during the experiment and none was affected by NMD. Plasma selenium levels in the implanted calves were significantly higher than in the deficient controls at each sampling period, but within normal ranges previously reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. 1953. Muscular dystrophy. Vet. Rec. 65: 835838.Google Scholar
Brown, F. 1953. The tocopherol content of farm feeding stuffs. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4: 161165.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M., Carson, R. B. and Brossard, G. A. 1968. Problems associated with selenium deficiency in beef calves. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 46: 853858.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M., Hoffman, I. and Jenkins, K. 1971. Control of nutritional muscular dystrophy in lambs by selenium implantations. Anim. Prod. 13: 315321.Google Scholar
Hoffman, I., Westerby, R. J. and Hidiroglou, M. 1968. Precise fluorometric micro-determination of selenium in agriculture material. J. Ass. off. analyt. Chem. 49: 10391042.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. O., Lidman, S. and Lindberg, P. 1970. Blood selenium in a beef herd affected with muscular degeneration. Ada vet. scand. 11: 324325.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. C., Hidiroglou, M. and Hamilton, H. 1964. The effect of prophylactic treatment of pregnant beef cows on the incidence of nutritional muscular dystrophy. A field trial. Can. vet. J. 5: 268273.Google Scholar
Reitman, S. and Frankel, S. 1957. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am. J. din. Path. 28: 5663.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed. Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar