Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:24:21.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling the effect of the stage of pregnancy on dairy cows' milk yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. B. Coulon ,
L. Pérochon  and
F. Lescourret
J. B. Coulon
Affiliation:
INRA, Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
L. Pérochon
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ecopathohgie, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
F. Lescourret
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ecopathohgie, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Get access

Abstract

The effect of pregnancy on milk yield was studied on a 601 lactation sample. One hundred and sixty-nine lactations of non-pregnant cows, managed under identical conditions, served as controls. Lactations were divided into five groups according to parity (primiparous or multiparous) and production potential (two ranks for primiparous cows, three ranks for multiparous cows). The difference between the individual milk yield of each pregnant animal, and the mean production of the corresponding controls was computed weekly from the week of conception. The reducing effect of pregnancy began to be measurable from the 20th week of pregnancy, regardless of the group studied or the week of conception. Analysing the amplitude of this effect restricted the investigation to the three following groups: (i) primiparous cows, (ii) low- and medium-producing multiparous cows, (iii) high-producing multiparous cows. The effect of pregnancy was lower in primiparous than in multiparous cows. In the latter, it was higher in high-producing cows, partly because of the greater calf weight. At the 29th pregnancy week, this effect reached -17middot;5, -2·4 and -3·6 kg/day in the three groups, respectively. In each of these three lactation groups, the following non-linear model

Y = −e−a[(Pw~18)e−bpw]

was fitted, where Y is the difference between the milk yields of pregnant and non-pregnant cows at a given stage (week), Pw is the pregnancy week, and a and b are parameters. The overall milk yield losses over a complete lactation, as estimated from the integral of that equation, reached 89, 137 and 203 kg, respectively in the three groups.

Keywords

dairy cowsmathematical modelsmilk yieldpregnancy
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 401 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachman, K. C, Hayen, M. J., Morse, D. and Wilcox, C. J. 1988. Effect of pregnancy, milk yield and somatic cell count on bovine milk fat hydrolysis, journal of Dairy Science 71: 925–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Anan, R. and Genizi, A. 1981. The effects of lactation, pregnancy and calendar month on milk records. Animal Production 33: 281–290.Google Scholar
Bar-Anan, R. and Soller, M. 1979. The effect of days open on milk yield and on breeding policy post partum. Animal Production 29: 109–119.Google Scholar
Bauman, D. E. and Currie, B. W. 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. journal of Dairy Science 63: 1514–1529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y. 1992. Physiological constraints to milk production: factors which determine nutrient partitioning, lactation persistency, and mobilization of body reserves. World Review of Animal Production 27: 20–25.Google Scholar
Convey, E. M. 1974. Serum hormone concentrations in ruminants during mammary growth, lactogenesis and lactation: a review, journal of Dairy Science 57: 905–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulon, J. B., Lescourret, F., Faye, B., Landais, E., Troccon, J. L. and Pérochon, L. 1993. Description de la base de données “LASCAR”, un outil pour l'étude des carriéres des vaches laitiéres. 1NRA Productions Animates 6: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eissa, H. M. and El-Belely, M. S. 1990. Sequential changes in plasma progesterone, total oestrogens and corticosteroids in the cow throughout pregnancy and around parturition. British Veterinary journal 146: 24–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erb, R. E., Goodwin, M. M., Morrison, R. A. and Shaw, A. O. 1952. Lactation studies. I. Effect of gestation. Journal of Dairy Science 35: 224–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faverdin, P., Hoden, A. and Coulon, J. B. 1987. Recommendations alimentaires pour les vaches laitiéres. Bulletin Technique CRZV Theix, 1NRA 70: 133–152.Google Scholar
Genizi, A., Schindler, H., Amir, S., Eger, S., Zarchi, M. and Foote, R. H. 1992. A simulation study of the effects of the calving interval on milk yields of dairy cows in fixed time periods. Animal Production 55: 309–314.Google Scholar
Guilbault, L. A., Thatcher, W. W., Collier, R. J. and Wilcox, C. J. 1985. Peripartum endocrine changes of conceptus and maternal units in Holstein heifers bearing genetically different conceptuses. Journal of Animal Science 61: 1505–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, S., Jolivet, E. and Messéan, A. 1992. La régression nonlinéaire. Méthodes et applications en biologie. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R., Petit, M., Tissier, M. and Guéguen, L. 1978. Reproduction, gestation et lactation. In Alimentation des ruminants (ed. larrige, R.), pp. 229–243. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Lescourret, F. and Coulon, J. B. 1994. Modelling the impact of mastitis on milk production by dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2289–2301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lescourret, F., Coulon, J. B., Pérochon, L. and Faye, B. 1994. Modelling the interrelationships between mastitis and milk production in dairy cows. Proceedings of the third international livestock farming systems symposium, Aberdeen, Scotland, 1-2 September 1994.Google Scholar
Lescourret, F., Pérochon, L., Coulon, J. B., Faye, B. and Landais, E. 1992. Modelling an information system using the merise method for agricultural research: the example of a database for a study on performances in dairy cows. Agricultural Systems 38: 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louca, A. and Legates, J. E. 1968. Production losses in dairy cattle due to days open, journal of Dairy Science 51: 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masselin, S., Sauvant, D., Chapoutot, P. and Milan, D. 1987. [Adjustment models for lactation curves.] Annales de Zootechnie 36: 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Rounsaville, T. R., Milligan, R. A. and Hintz, R. L. 1980. Relationship between days open and cumulative milk yield at various intervals from parturition from high and low producing cows, journal of Dairy Science 63: 1317–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randel, R. D. and Erb, R. E. 1971. Reproductive steroids in the bovine. VI. Changes and interrelationships from 0 to 260 days of pregnancy, Journal of Animal Science 33: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1990. Handbook of nonlinear regression models. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. and Henderson, C. R. 1972. Effects of days dry and days open on Holstein milk production, journal of Dairy Science 55: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, M. M, Hansen, L. B., Steuernagel, G. R. and Kuck, A. L. 1990. Variation of milk, fat, protein and somatic cells for dairy cattle, journal of Dairy Science 73: 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. K., Wilcox, C., Martin, F. G. and Thatcher, W. W. 1990. Effects of stage of lactation and pregnancy and their interactions on milk yield and constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 1586–1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spike, P. W. and Freeman, A. E. 1967. Environmental influences on monthly variation in milk constituents. journal of Dairy Science 50: 1897–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS user's guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Strandberg, E. and Lundberg, C. 1991. A note on the estimation of environmental effects on lactation curves. Animal Production 53: 399–402.Google Scholar
Terqui, M., Delouis, D., Thimonier, J. and Ortavant, R. 1975. Relations entre les oestrogénes au cours de la gestation, le poids á la naissance et la croissance ultérieure des veaux de race charolaise. Comptc Rendu Académic des Sciences de Paris D 280: 2789–2792.Google Scholar