Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:59:48.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed v. mono-grazing by steers and sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. Nolan  and
J. Connolly
T. Nolan
Affiliation:
An Foras Talúntais, Western Research Centre, Creagh, Ballinrobe, Co. Mayo, Republic of, Ireland
J. Connolly
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, An Foras Talúntais, 19 Sandymount Avenue, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The effects of mixed v. mono-grazing by steers and sheep on individual animal growth rate, pasture carrying capacity and live-weight output per ha were measured in a 4-year (1978 to 1981) experiment, after a preliminary familiarization year, 1977. Annual stocking rate treatments consisted of three monosteer, three mono-sheep and seven mixtures of steers and sheep. Annual average stocking rates were 2·11 steers † 8·1 ewes per ha under mixed grazing and, under mono-grazing, 4·44 steers and 15·2 ewes per ha. The range from low to high in stocking rate in mono- or mixed grazing was close to 40%. Over the 4 years a total of about 280 steers, 900 ewes and 1100 lambs were used.

Overall, mixed grazing increased average lamb daily live-weight gain (ADG) to weaning and to drafting from 246 to 265 g (P < 0001) and from 211 to 223 g (P < 0·001) respectively. Steer ADG for these periods was increased from 1·419 to 1·520 kg (P < 0·01) and from 0·950 to 1·094 kg (P < 0·001). The choice of reference mono-grazing stocking rates for comparisons of mixed v. mono-grazing ADG can affect these results. Average live-weight outputs (kg/ha) from grazing for the mono-steers, mono-sheep, and mixed grazing were 663, 690 and 714, the range in the latter over the seven mixed grazing treatments being from 605 to 805. Stocking rate was the main factor affecting output per ha. Because of the management rules used in this experiment mixed grazing effects are more appropriately assessed through ADG and measures based on it than on output per unit of area.

Models were fitted relating steer and lamb ADG to lamb weaning and lamb and steer drafting to stocking rates of steers and ewes. Mixed grazing benefits to steer and lamb ADG to drafting were greater as their proportion in the mix declined and increased with stocking rate. At the 50% proportion, lamb and steer ADG were improved by 5·2 and 3·4% respectively at low stocking rate and 9·4 and 6·6 at high stocking rate. Predicted steer ADG to lamb weaning for a given steer stocking rate increased with increases in ewe proportion up to five ewes per ha and decreased rapidly with further increments in ewe proportion.

Mixed grazing efficiency was also evaluated through the Relative Resource Total. This showed that under mono-grazing 10 to 13% more area was required to produce the same grazing season output as under mixed grazing. The 10% improvement in carrying capacity was exceeded for ewe: steer frequencies ranging from 1·5: 1 to 10: 1. Explanations for this greater efficiency in resource capture/use under mixed grazing are discussed.

Substitution rates for lamb ADG to weaning (2·35) and to drafting (2·86) and for steer ADG to drafting (0·21) were fairly constant over the 4 years 1978 to 1981.

Selection of mixed stocking rates to suit growth rate targets for different animal types and to match food supply with demand under varying soil/climatic/topographical conditions is discussed.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 519 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bjarnason, V. 1984. Effects of mixed grazing on some pasture/animal relationships. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Dublin.Google Scholar
Collins, D. P., Drennan, M. J. and Flynn, A. V. 1977. Potential of Irish grassland for beef production. Proceedings of the International Meeting on Animal Production from Temperate Grassland, Dublin, pp. 12–19.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 1974. Linear programming and the optimum carrying capacity of range under common use. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83: 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. 1986. On difficulties with replacement-series methodology in mixture experiments. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. 1987. On the use of response models in mixture experiments. Oecologia 72: 95–103.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. and Nolan, T. 1976. The design andanalysis of mixed grazing experiments. Animal Production 23: 63–71.Google Scholar
Conway, A. 1968. Grazing management in relation to beef production. IV. Effect of seasonal variation in the stocking rate of beef cattle on animal production and on sward composition. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 93–104.Google Scholar
Conway, A., McLoughlin, A. and Murphy, W. E. 1972. Development of a cattle and sheep farm. Animal Management Series, An Foras Talúntais, Dublin, No. 2.Google Scholar
Cook, C. W., Harris, L. E. and Young, M. C. 1967. Botanical and nutritive content of diets of cattle and sheep under single and common use of mountain range. Journal of Animal Science 26: 1169–1174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, I. A., Frame, J. and Arnot, D. P. 1981. Mixed grazing of cattle and sheep versus cattle only in an intensive grassland system. Animal Production 33: 265–272.Google Scholar
Gilsenan, B. 1986. Good mixers. Farm and Food Research 17: (2), 51–52.Google Scholar
Kelly, F. J. 1981. Some aspects of autumn and spring management of permanent pastures under mixed grazing. M. Agr. Sc. Thesis, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. 1972. Fat lamb production in the west of Ireland. 2. Effects of three stocking rates on lamb growth rate and on production of lamb carcass meat and wool per hectare. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 47–62.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. 1977. The effects of some components of the animal factor on a permanent pasture. Ph.D. Thesis, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. 1980. Research on mixed grazing by cattle and sheep in Ireland. Proceedings of Workshop on Mixed Grazing, Galway, pp. 1–19. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. 1982. Meat production. In Efficient Grassland Farming (ed. Corrall, A. J.), Occasional Symposium, British Grassland Society, No. 14, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. and Connolly, J. 1977. Mixed stocking by sheep and steers — a review. Herbage Abstracts 47: 367–374.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. and Connolly, J. 1989a. Mixed sheep and cattle grazing research in Ireland: principal animal production and explanatory results during 15 years. Fourrages. In press.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. and Connolly, J. 1989b. Mixed sheep and cattle grazing research in Ireland: extension/development experiences and design and analysis methods. Fourrages. In press.Google Scholar
Nolan, T., Flanagan, J. P., Grennan, E. and O'toole, M. A. 1977. The potential of Irish grassland for sheep production. Proceedings of the International Meeting on Animal Production from Temperate Grassland, Dublin, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. and Kiely, J. 1970. Some effects of stocking rate on soil and pasture. Animal Production Research Report, An Foras Talúntais, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Rancourt, M. de, Nolan, T. and Connolly, J. 1980. Measurement of animal grazing preferences. Proceedings of Workshop on Mixed Grazing, Galway, pp. 127–139. An Foras Talúntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Ronnel, F., Nolan, T. and Connolly, J. 1980. Some effects of mixed grazing on pasture growth and chemical composition. Proceedings of Workshop on Mixed Grazing, Galway, pp. 127–139. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Ryan, M., O'keefe, W. F., Connolly, J. and Collins, D. P. 1984. The use of fertiliser nitrogen on grassland for beef production. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 27–40.Google Scholar