Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T21:52:46.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lifetime growth and carcass composition of heifers and steers non-implanted or sequentially implanted with anabolic agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. G. Keane  and
M. J. Drennan
M. G. Keane
Affiliation:
An Foras Taluntais, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Eire
M. J. Drennan
Affiliation:
An Foras Taluntais, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Eire
Get access

Abstract

Sixty-four (48 female and 16 male) spring-born Hereford × Friesian calves were used to examine the effects of sex type, heifer slaughter age and implantation with anabolic agents on growth and carcass composition. Non-implanted and implanted heifers were slaughtered after 491, 612 and 731 days and non-implanted and implanted steers (castrated on day 81) were slaughtered after 731 days. Implantation was with 36 mg resorcylic acid lactone (RAL) on days 81 and 171 and RAL plus 300 mg trenbolone acetate on days 395, 491, 583 and 658.

Carcass weights of non-implanted and implanted heifers slaughtered at 491, 612 and 731 days were 189 and 206, 218 and 235 and 290 and 326 (s.e.d. 10·1) kg respectively. Carcass lean, bone and fat weights and fat proportion increased with increasing slaughter age but proportions of lean and bone decreased.

There was no difference between heifers and steers in growth rate to 395 days but from 395 to 731 days the steers grew faster than the heifers. Non-implanted and implanted steer carcass weights at 731 days were 297 and 355 (s.e.d. 9·5) kg respectively. Steer carcasses had higher lean and bone proportions and a lower fat proportion than heifer carcasses. Implanted animals had heavier carcasses than non-implanted animals and all of the extra carcass weight consisted of lean and bone. The results indicate that non-implanted and implanted heifers and steers had similar lean proportions when the heifers were 31 and 70 kg carcass weight respectively lighter than the steers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 359 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Slough.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978. Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27: 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Jones, S. D. M., Price, M. A., Fukuhara, R., Butterreld, R. M. and Hardin, R. T. 1979. Patterns of carcass fat deposition in heifers, steers and bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1971. Single-suckled beef production. 2. Influence of stocking rate during the grazing season, creep grazing of the calf and double-suckling on calf performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 297–305.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Keane, M. G. 1986. Performance of implanted and unimplanted fattening steers fed different levels of concentrates with silage. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association 12th Annual Research Meeting. pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J., Rochk, J. F. and L'Estrange, J. L. 1981. Effect of monensin sodium, resorcylic acid lactone and trenbolone acetate on performance and feed intake of finishing cattle. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 113–123.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. V., Wood, J. D. and Whelehan, O. P. 1986. The effects of a combined androgenic — oestrogenic anabolic agent in steers and bulls. 1. Growth and carcass composition. Animal Production 42: 203–211.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1981. Systems of beef production from dairy herd calves. In Calf to Beef, Handbook Series No. 17, An Foras Taluntais, Dublin, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1985. Beef production from Friesian calves. Veterinary Update 1: 34–36.Google Scholar
Fortin, A., Reid, J. T., Maiga, A. M., Sim, D. W. and Wellington, G. H. 1980a. Effect of energy intake level and influence of breed and sex on the physical composition of the carcass of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 51: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, A., Reid, J. T., Maiga, A. M., Sim, D. W. and Wellington, G. H. 1980b. Effect of level of energy intake and influence of breed and sex on muscle growth and distribution in the bovine carcass. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1288–1296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredeen, H. T., Martin, A. H. and Weiss, G. M. 1971. Characteristics of youthful beef carcasses in relation to weight, age and sex. II. Carcass measurements and yield of retail product. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredeen, H. T., Weiss, G. M., Rahnefeld, G. W., Lawson, J. E. and Newman, J. A. 1982. Environmental and genetic effects on preweaning performance of calves from first-cross cows. II. Growth traits. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62: 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, H. and Topps, J. H. 1981. Effect of hormones on the growth and body composition of animals. Nutrition Abstracts and Review Series B 51: 521–540.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. 1982. Effects of trenbolone acetate and resorcylic acid lactone on protein metabolism and growth in steers. Animal Production 34: 309–314.Google Scholar
Harte, F. J., Curran, S. and Vial, V. E. 1965. The production of beef from young bulls. 1. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 189–204.Google Scholar
Haycock, R. E. and Stewart, D. A. 1973. A comparison of the Charolais, British Friesian and Hereford breeds as sires of crossbred single-suckled calves for beef production. Animal Production 17: 267–273.Google Scholar
Hedrick, H. B., Thompson, G. B. and Kraiise, G. F. 1969. Comparison of feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of half-sib bulls, steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 29: 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. D. M., Price, M. A. and Berg, R. T. 1980. The growth and distribution of muscle in bulls and heifers of two breeds. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60: 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M. G. 1984. Use of implants for beef cattle. Journal of Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association 18: 44–52.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. 1985. Use of anabolic agents in beef cattle during the grazing season. Irish Veterinary News, April, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G., Drennan, M. J. and Sherington, J. 1986a. Effects of nutrition and anabolic agents in the growing and finishing phases on growth rate and carcass weight of Friesian steers. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 25: 11–21.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G., Flynn, A. V. and Harte, F. J. 1986b. Responses to sequential use of different anabolic agents in young bull, young steer and two-year-old steer beef systems. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 25: 153–166.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Sherington, J. 1985a. Response in growing and finishing steers to long- and short-acting anabolic agents. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 1–10.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Sherington, J. 1985b. Effects of frequency of implantation and type of anabolic agent on performance and carcass traits of finishing steers. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 161–169.Google Scholar
McNally, D. H. 1970. A note on the weights and weight gains of some Charolais and contemporary-calves of other breeds in Northern Ireland. Animal Production 12: 539–542.Google Scholar
Mukhoty, H. and Berg, R. T. 1973. Influence of breed and sex on muscle weight distribution of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81: 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, G. B. 1982. Effects of double suckling at pasture. 2. Calf performance. Animal Production 35: 395–400.Google Scholar
Rahnefei, D. G. W., Fredeen, H. T., Weiss, G. M., Lawson, J. E. and Newman, J. A. 1983. Sex and year effects on carcass characteristics of three-way cross beef cattle reared at two locations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riokdan, E. B. and Mellon, K. 1978. Beef carcass classification as an aid to prediction of carcass value. Irish Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology 7: 9–32.Google Scholar
Riordan, E. B., Schwer, S. J. and Godson, C. 1978. Beef Cuts Code: Specifications for Cutting and Trimming of Beef. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Roche, J. F. 1980. The use of growth promoters in beef cattle. In The Use, Residues and Toxicology of Growth Promoters, pp. 1–12. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar