Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:56:11.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influences of production circumstances on the economic revenue of cattle breeding programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. F. Groen
A. F. Groen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The economic values of cattle production traits differ with different production circumstances. This sensitivity implies that (1) production circumstances influence the revenue of breeding programmes, and (2) losses in revenue of breeding programmes occur when circumstances used in defining breeding goals are incorrect with regard to actual production circumstances at the moments of expression of genetic superiorities. In this study, these effects are quantified for a set of genotype and index traits, including milk production traits, food intake capacity and live weight. Twenty-four situations of production circumstances were studied, including alternative output limitations, milk production levels, roughage qualities and product (milk, beef) and production-factor (food) prices.

Results indicate that type of output limitation is the most important factor in determining revenue. Also, incorrect prediction of type of limitation leads to highest losses in revenue found (proportionately 0·01 to 0·06 of revenue). Losses in revenue due to incorrect prediction of production circumstances seem too low to justify complete diversification of cattle breeding goals within a breeding organization, except for different types of output limitations.

Keywords

cattleeconomic analysismathematical modelsproduction controls.
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 469 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelhelm, R., Bückenhoff, E., Bischoff, T., Fewson, D. and Rittler, A. 1972. Die leistungsmerkmale beim rind. Teil A: Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Hohenheimer Arbeiten, Tierische Produktion. Heft 64. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Brascamp, E. W. 1973. Model calculations concerning economic optimalization of Al-breeding with cattle. I. The economic value of genetic improvement in milk yield. Zeitschrift fur Tierziichtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 90: 1–15.Google Scholar
Brascamp, E. W. 1978. Methods on economic optimization of animal breeding plans. Report B-134, Research Institute for Animal Husbandry “Schoonoord”, Zeist.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. 1969. Animal breeding theory. Internordic Licenciate Course in Quantitative Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Agricultural College of Norway, as.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1988. Derivation of economic values in cattle breeding. A model at farm level. Agricultural Systems 27: 195–213.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1989a. Economic values in cattle breeding. I. Influences of production circumstances in situations without output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1989b. Economic values in cattle breeding. II. Influences of production circumstances in situations with output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 17–30.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. and Korver, S. 1989. The economic value of feed intake capacity of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 22: 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haapa, M. and SyväväRvi, J. 1987. Relationship for growth and intake between young bulls and daughters. In Performance Testing of AI-Bulls for Efficiency and Beef Production in Dairy and Dual Purpose Breeds (ed. Korver, S., Averdunk, G. and Andersen, B. Bech), European Association for Animal Production, Publication No. 34, pp. 99–102. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics, USA 28: 476–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landbouw-Economisch Instituut/Centraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek. 1987. Landbouwcijfers 1987. Den Haag.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1984. Estimates of genetic parameters for milk and fat yield for the first three lactations in British Friesian cows. Animal Production 38: 313–322.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H., Lukaszewicz, M. and Pearson, R. E. 1981. Dual-purpose selection in dairy cattle. I. Genetic and phenotypic estimates. Zeitschrift fiir Tierzuchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 98: 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederlands Rundvee Syndicaat. 1988. Jaarstatistieken 1987. Arnhem.Google Scholar
Nicholas, F. W. and Smith, C. 1983. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Animal Production 36: 341–353.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1978. The effect of inflation and form of investment on the estimated value of genetic improvement in farm livestock. Animal Production 26: 101–110.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1985. Scope for selecting many breeding stocks of possible economic value in the future. Animal Production 41: 403–412.Google Scholar
Van Arendonk, J. A. M., Wilmink, J. B. M. and Dukhuizen, A. A. 1985. Consequences of a restriction of the herd production for the selection on milk, fat and protein. In Adapting EEC Cattle Breeding Programmes to Market Realities (ed. Krausslich, H. and Lutterbach, A.), Report EUR 10057, p. 211–220. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Wilmink, J. B. M. and De Graaf, F. M. 1986. Genetische Parameters voor 305-Dagan Produkties in de Eerste Lactatie en de Bijstelling van de Netto Melkgeld-Index. Nederlands Rundvee Syndicaat, ArnhemGoogle Scholar