Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:43:17.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth patterns of muscles of Merino sheep from birth to 517 days

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. L. Lohse ,
F. P. Moss  and
R. M. Butterfield
C. L. Lohse
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, Australia
F. P. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, Australia
R. M. Butterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, Australia
Get access

Summary

Eighty-two Merino sheep from birth to 517 days old were dissected into individual muscles. A system of overlapping growth coefficients was used to classify the growth patterns of 96 muscles and nine muscle groups. The relative size of muscles and groups at birth and one year are expressed as percentages of total half-carcass muscle weight.

Some differences were noted from the previously recorded growth patterns of bovine muscles. The groups of muscles in the proximal part of the pelvic limb and those surrounding the spinal column were relatively faster-growing in sheep than in cattle.

The patterns of the muscle groups are discussed relative to their function and it is shown that the patterns of growth of muscles within some groups are markedly different from the pattern of the whole group. This is most apparent in those groups with complex functions, and it is clear that anatomical grouping of muscles and functional grouping of muscles will be similar only in those regions of the body with relatively simple actions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 117 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterfield, R. M. 1963. A Study of the Musculature of the Steer Carcase. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1964. Estimation of carcase composition: The anatomical approach. Symp. Carcase Comp. Appraisal Meat Animals, Melbourne, pp. 4–1 to 4–13.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966a. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966b. Relative growth patterns of commercially important muscle groups of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966c. A nutritional effect on relative growth of muscles. Proc. Ausi. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 298–304.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and May, N. D. S. 1966. Muscles of the Ox. Univ. Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D. 1962. Growth and development of sheep. I. A carcass dissection technique. N. Z. Jl agrie. Res. 5: 190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, P. D. 1965. Growth and Development of Sheep, with Special Reference to New Zealand Breeds.D. Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. 1968. Body development and some problems of its evaluation. Growth and Development of Mammals. Pp. 195–211, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. and Heap, F. C. 1967. Changes in body composition of the sow during pregnancy. Anim. Prod. 9: 237–245.Google Scholar
May, N. D. S. 1964. Anatomy of the Sheep, 2nd ed. Univ. of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1968. A dissection study of the distribution of tissues in lamb carcasses. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7: 297–302.Google Scholar
Walker, D. E. 1961. A study of the growth and development of Jersey cattle. N. Z. Jl agrie. Res. 4: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar