Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T14:25:11.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth hormone response to infusion of somatostatin in dairy calves: testing its use as a diagnostic tool for genetic merit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

P. Wiener ,
K. D. Angus ,
E. McCullough  and
J. A. Woolliams
P. Wiener
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
K. D. Angus
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
E. McCullough
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes a two-part study evaluating the use of growth hormone (GH) response to infusions of somatostatin (SRIF) and GH-releasing factor (GRF) as an indicator of genetic merit in dairy cattle. The first part of the study involved the development of a standard test procedure. This was achieved in two sub-trials, the first testing three SRIF doses, 0·6, 3·0 and 15 µg/kg per h, given over an infusion length of 3 h. The second involved infusing 3·0 μg/kg per h SRIF for either 20 min, 1 h or 3 h. The GH response was measured in serum during the infusion and for 2 h following cessation, during which time a rebound response in GH occurred. As a consequence of these trials, a total of 40 British Friesian calves from two lines genetically divergent for yield traits were infused with 3·0 μg/kg per h for a period of 1 h and at the end of the infusion given 0·1 μg/kg GRF. Five hours later, GRF was administered without SRIF. The protocol was repeated on 2 days consecutively. Results suggested that calves of high merit had lower SRIF-induced baselines than their low-line contemporaries. There were no differences in the GH concentrations immediately following GRF administration, either with or without SRIF. The results from this trial, together with previously published work, indicated that calves selected for high milk fat plus milk protein production may be more sensitive to SRIF such that GH is regulated by lower concentrations of SRIF. However, the practical use of GH response to SRIF as an indicator of genetic merit for dairy cattle may be limited because of logistical difficulties in implementation.

Keywords

dairy cattlegenetic meritgrowth hormonesomatostatin
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 219 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brazeau, P., Rivier, J., Vale, W. and Guillemin, R. 1974. Inhibition of growth hormone secretion in the rat by synthetic somatostatin. Endocrinology 94: 184–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. G., Chambers, G., Lewin, J. and Robinson, I. C. A. F. 1986. Automated repetitive microsampling of blood: growth hormone profiles in conscious male rats. Journal of Endocrinology 111: 27–35.Google Scholar
Clark, R. G. and Robinson, I. C. A. F. 1988. Paradoxical growth promoting effects induced by patterned infusions of somatostatin in female rats. Endocrinology 122: 2675–2682.Google Scholar
Davis, S. L. and Anfinson, M. 1975. Dose response influence of prostaglandin E1 and somatostatin on plasma concentrations of growth hormone, prolactin and thyrotropin in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41: 172–177.Google Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee. 1997. GENSTAT 5 release 4.1, third edition. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted.Google Scholar
Hafs, H. D., Kiser, T. E., Haynes, N. B., Kesner, J. S. and Stellflug, J. N. 1977. Release of pituitary hormones, cortisol, testosterone and insulin to prostaglandin F2 alpha given during intra-carotid infusion of bulls. Journal of Animal Science 44: 1061–1066.Google Scholar
Hodate, K., Johke, T., Kawabata, A., Ohashi, S., Shiraki, M. and Sawana, S. 1984. Effects of synthetic growth hormone releasing factor and somatostatin on growth hormone secretion in young bulls. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 55: 120–123.Google Scholar
Kazmer, G. W. and Zinn, S. A. 1998. Serum somatotropin concentrations in Holstein heifers administered growth hormone-releasing factor and somatostatin. Animal Science 66: 551–556.Google Scholar
Løvendahl, P., Angus, K. D. and Woolliams, J. A. 1991. The effect of genetic selection for milk yield on the response to growth hormone secretagogues in immature cattle. Journal of Endocrinology 128: 419–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Løvendahl, P. and Sejrsen, K. 1993. Growth hormone release in calves selected for milk fat yield. Animal Production 56: 285–291.Google Scholar
Løvendahl, P., Woolliams, J. A. and Sinnett-Smith, P.A. 1992. Responses of growth hormone to various doses of growth hormone releasing factor and thyrotropin release hormone administered separately and in combination to dairy calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 1045–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. C., Rassman, L. G., Siler, T. M., Rivier, J., Yen, S. S. C. and Guillemin, R. 1974. Inhibition of the sleep-related peak in physiologic human growth hormone release by somatostatin. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 38: 496.Google Scholar
Siler, T. M., Vanderberg, G., Yen, S. S. C., Brazeau, P., Vale, W. and Guillemin, R. 1973. Inhibition of growth hormone release in humans by somatostatin. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 37: 632.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1992. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements, release 6·07. SAS technical report P229. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sugihara, H., Minami, S. and Wakabayashi, I. 1989. Post-somatostatin rebound secretion of growth hormone is dependent on growth hormone-releasing factor in unrestrained female rats. Journal of Endocrinology 122: 583–591.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Angus, K. D. and Wilson, S. B. 1993. Endogenous pulsing and stimulated release of growth hormone in dairy calves of high and low genetic merit. Animal Production 56: 1–8.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Smith, C. 1988. The value of indicator traits in the genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Animal Production 46: 333–345.Google Scholar