Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T02:12:46.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating feeding strategies for dairy cows: a modelling approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. Doyle
C. J. Doyle
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Using a model to simulate food intake and the partition of food between milk production and live-weight gain, an attempt has been made to explore the financial implications of different levels and patterns of concentrate feeding, where silage is fed ad libitum. In the case of high-yielding cows it appeared that, although feeding more concentrates increased overall lactation yield, profits per cow and per hectare declined with increasing concentrate usage. This raises doubts concerning the traditional view that higher profits result from increasing yields per cow. Comparing different patterns of feeding it also appeared that there was no significant economic loss from flat-rate compared to stepped feeding of concentrates, where cows had ad libitum access to silage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 47 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. 1979. Voluntary food intake. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow (ed. Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.), pp. 23–48. Granada Publishing Ltd, St. Albans.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1967. The Feeding of Dairy Cows for Optimal Production. The George Scott Robertson Memorial Lecture. The Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1971. The effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding before calving. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 33:253–270.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1972. Effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding during lactation. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 34: 265–288.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1976. Plane of nutrition for the dairy cow. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 271–285. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J., Smith, T. and Siviter, J. W. 1975. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. IX. Food utilization in lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Thomas, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. University of Nottingham Feed Manufacturers Conference, January 1981, pp. 49–70. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Bywater, A. C. 1976. Simulation of the intake and partition of nutrients by the dairy cow. II. The yield and composition of milk. Agric. Syst. 1: 261–279.Google Scholar
Combellas, J. 1977. Studies on the herbage intake and milk yield of dairy cows. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Agric, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P. and Boyne, A. W. 1961. An estimate of the energy expended for maintenance by strip grazed dairy cows. Proc. 8th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, Schlussbericht, pp. 245–247.Google Scholar
Corrall, A. J. 1978. The effect of genotype and water supply on the seasonal pattern of grass production. Proc. 7th Gen. Meet. Eur. GrassldFed., Ghent, pp. 2.21–2.32.Google Scholar
Corrall, A. J., Neal, H. D. St. C. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1982. Silage in milk production: A simulation model to study the economic impact of management decisions in the production and use of silage in a dairy enterprise. Tech. Rep. 29, Grassld Res. Inst., Hurley, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K. and Holmes, W. 1970. Prediction of the voluntary intake of food by dairy cows. 2. Lactating grazing cows. Anim. Prod. 12: 213–224.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1981. Feed input-milk output relationships in the spring-calving dairy cow. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 15–31. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. and Jones, J. G. W. 1965. The feed intake of milk cows. II. The effect of roughage quality during late pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod. 7:39–51.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1977. The effect of the plane and pattern of concentrate feeding on milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88:79–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1979. The effect of level and frequency of concentrate feeding on the performance of dairy cows of different yield potential. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 743–751.Google Scholar
Le du, Y. L. P., Baker, R. D., Newberry, R. D. and Wade, M. H. 1978. Grazing severity and milk production in setstocked grazing systems. In Grazing: Sward Production and Livestock Output, pp. 6.11–6.12. British Grassld Soc. Winter Meeting, 1978. British Grassland Society, Hurley.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1981. UK Dairy Facts and Figures 1981. Fed. UK Milk Marketing Boards, Thames Ditton.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1978 Definition of terms used in Agricultural Business Management. 2nd ed.Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pinner.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F. 1980. The feeding value of grass and grass products. In Grass: its Production and Utilisation (ed. Holmes, W.), pp. 70–124. British Grassland Society. Blackwells, Oxford.Google Scholar
Østergaard, V. 1979. Strategies for concentrate feeding to attain optimum feeding level in high yielding dairy cows. Beretn. St. Husdyrbrugs Fors., 482.Google Scholar
Strickland, M. J. and Broster, W. H. 1981. The effect of different levels of nutrition at two stages of the lactation on milk production and live-weight change in Friesian cows and heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 96: 677–690.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding Strategies for Dairy Cows (ed. Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Taylor, J. C.), pp. 8.1–8.10. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Vadiveloo, J. and Holmes, W. 1979. The prediction of the voluntary feed intake of dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 553–562.Google Scholar