Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:44:41.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of variance of maternal lineage effects at the Langhill dairy herd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

T. Roughsedge ,
S. Brotherstone  and
P. M. Visscher
T. Roughsedge
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
P. M. Visscher
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

Evidence to support the existence of a maternal lineage variance component for production and food intake traits at the Langhill experimental dairy herd was investigated. Maternal pedigree records of the herd were traced back to the points of cytoplasmic origin using herd book records. Cytoplasmic origin was defined as the earliest maternal ancestor of a cow and used to assign cows to maternal lineages. This was either a grade-up cow or an ancestor traced back to 1920. The tracing resulted in the cows being assigned to 56 maternal lineages, ranging in size from one to 72 cows. A total of 1118 records of 517 cows, all with a first lactation record, were used in the analysis. Traits analysed were daily milk, fat and protein yield, fat %, protein %, food dry-matter intake, net energy of milk production, a measure of milk production efficiency, average condition, and calving condition, all averaged over the first 26 weeks of lactation. The analysis was performed using a residual maximum likelihood animal model with and without a random component for maternal lineage. Possible bias, due to the fact that the sires were a select sample from the population, was also examined. No significant effect was found in the analysis of the full data set that could be assigned to maternal lineage. Fat yield was the only trait to show a variance component approaching a 5% significance level with a magnitude of 4% of phenotypic variance. However, when maternal lineages of at least five cows were considered, a significant 4% maternal lineage component of phenotypic variance was found for fat yield. The power of the analysis to detect a variance component of less than 4% was shown to be poor. No evidence was found for a maternal lineage component of food intake traits or condition score. Treating sire as a fixed effect or regressing data on sire EBV made little difference to the maternal lineage component.

Keywords

cytoplasmic inheritancedairy cowsheritabilitymaternal effectsmilk yield
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, B. R., McDaniel, B. T. and Robinson, O. W. 1985. Effects of cytoplasmic inheritance on production traits of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2038–2051.Google Scholar
Boettcher, P. J., Kuhn, M. T. and Freeman, A. E. 1996a. Impacts of cytoplasmic inheritance on genetic evaluations. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 663–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boettcher, P. J., Steverink, D. W. B., Beitz, D. C., Freeman, A. E. and McDaniel, B. T. 1996b. Multiple herd evaluation of the effects of maternal lineage on yield traits of Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 655–662.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P., Freeman, A. E. and Boettcher, P. J. 1997. Cytoplasmic and mitochondrial inheritance of economic traits in cattle. Livestock Production Science 47: 115–124.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, E. 1996. REML VCE a multivariate multi model restricted maximum likelihood (co)variance component estimation package version 3.2 user’s guide. Federal Research Center of Agriculture, Mariensee, Germany.Google Scholar
Huizinga, H. A., Korver, S., McDaniel, C. A., and Politiek, R. D. 1986. Maternal effects due to cytoplasmic inheritance in dairy cattle. Influence on milk production and reproduction traits. Livestock Production Science 15: 11–25.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, C. A., Newbold, J. E., Potter, S. S. and Edgell, M. H. 1974. Maternal inheritance of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nature 251: 536–538.Google Scholar
Kennedy, B. W. 1986. A further look at evidence for cytoplasmic inheritance of production traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 3100–3105.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Pander, B. L., Hill, W. G. and Thompson, R. 1992. Genetic parameters of test day records of British Holstein-Friesian heifers. Animal Production 55: 1–4.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Esslemont, R. J., Thompson, R., Veerkamp, R. F., Kossaibati, M. A. and Simm, G. 1998. Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle. Animal Science 66: 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughsedge, T., Brotherstone, S. and Visscher, P. M. 1998. Lack of evidence for cytoplasmic inheritance for milk production traits at the Langhill dairy herd. Proceedings of the sixth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, vol. 23, pp. 351–354.Google Scholar
Schutz, M. M., Freeman, A. E., Beitz, D. C. and Mayfield, J. E. 1992. The importance of maternal lineage on milk yield traits of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1331–1341.Google Scholar
Seykora, A. J. and McDaniel, B. T. 1983. Heritabilities and correlations of lactation yields and fertility for Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1486–1493.Google Scholar
Simm, G., Persaud, P., Neilson, D. R., Parkinson, H. and McGuirk, B. J. 1991. Predicting food intake in dairy heifers from early lactation records. Animal Production 52: 421–434.Google Scholar
Stram, D. O. and Lee, J. W. 1994. Variance-components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171–1177.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Effect of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39: 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. M. and Thompson, R. 1992. Comparisons between genetic variances estimated from different types of relatives in dairy cattle. Animal Production 55: 315–320.Google Scholar
Wilmut, I, Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J. and Campbell, K. H. S. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385: 810–813.Google Scholar