Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T09:32:10.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of feed additives in enhancing performance of growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. L. Veum ,
R. Lauxen  and
J.-T. Yen
T. L. Veum
Affiliation:
110 Animal Science Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 USA†
R. Lauxen
Affiliation:
110 Animal Science Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 USA†
J.-T. Yen
Affiliation:
110 Animal Science Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 USA†
Get access

Abstract

The efficacy of feed additives in enhancing the performance of growing pigs, together with the effect of different protein levels (18 v. 16% from 13 to 18 kg body weight and 16 v. 14% from 18 to 39 kg body-weight), were evaluated in three experiments with 412 pigs. In Experiment 1, from 13 to 39 kg body weight, pigs receiving 55 p.p.m. carbadox (C) produced a greater (P<0·05) average daily live-weight gain than did the non-medicated (NM) pigs and those receiving 275 p.p.m. chlortetracycline-sulphamethazine-penicillin (ASP) with a similar but non-significant (P>0·05) trend n i daily feed intake and gain/feed ratio. The ASP pigs also produced a greater (P<0·05) weight gain than the NM pigs. The higher dietary protein level sequence produced a greater (JP<0·05) weight gain and gain/feed ratio.

In Experiment 2, from 16 to 39 kg body weight, NM control pigs achieved high weight gains, and all the feed additive treatments studied [C+106 p.p.m. of the worming agent pyrantel tartrate (C+P); ASP+8 mg of the worming agent levamisole-HCl per kg body weight fed once on day 7 of the experiment (ASP+L); and 113 p.p.m. tylosin+13 p.p.m. of the worming agent hygromycin B] were similar to the NM controls in daily feed intake, weight gain and gain/feed ratio. However, in Experiment 3, the C+P and ASP+L treatments resulted in a greater (P<0·05) weight gain with a trend toward greater daily feed intake than did the NM control treatment from 17 to 35 kg. The weight gain of the ASP+L pigs was also greater (P<0·05) than that of 165 p.p.m. oxytetracycline and NM pigs from 35 to 57 kg. From 57 to 96 kg all the pigs received the same NM control diet and their weight gains were similar. The gain/feed ratio was similar among the treatments within each of the weight periods in Experiment 3. Pigs slaughtered at the beginning and at various stages during Experiments 2 and 3 were free of internal parasites and migration damage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beames, R. M. 1969. Further trials on the response of early-weaned pigs and rats to diet supplemented with tylosin and high levels of copper. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 573–577.Google Scholar
Braude, R. 1978. Antibiotics in animal feeds in Great Britain. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1425–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braude, R. and Johnson, B. C. 1953. Effect of aureomycin on nitrogen and water metabolism in growing pigs. J. Nutr. 49: 505–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catron, D. V., Jensen, A. H., Homeyer, P. G., Maddock, H. M. and Ashton, G. C. 1952. Re-evaluation of protein requirements of growing-fattening swine as influenced by feeding an antibiotic. J. Anim. Sci. 11: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, D. P. and Arakawa, A. 1969. Prophylactic efficacy of pyrantel against Ascaris suum in swine. Cornell Vet. 59: 605–610.Google ScholarPubMed
Elliot, R. F., Johnson, D. D. and Shor, A. L. 1964. Effect of chlortetracycline, sulfa-methazine and procaine penicillin on the performance of starting pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, D. L. and White, R. G. 1975. Anthelmintic activity of levamisole against Ascaris, Trichuris and Metastrongylus infection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 838–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilliam, H. C. Jr and Martin, J. R. 1975. Economic importance of antibiotics in feeds o t producers and consumers of pork, beef and veal. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 1241–1255.Google Scholar
Hays, V. W. 1978. The role of antibiotics in efficient livestock production. In Proc. int. Symp. Nutrition and Drug Interrelations (ed. Hathcock, J. N. and Coon, J.), pp. 545–576. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, C. E., Waitt, W. P. and Means, T. M. 1960. Tylosin—a new antibiotic growth stimulant for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 1269 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kiser, J. S. 1976. A perspective on the use of antibiotics in animal feeds. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1058–1072.Google ScholarPubMed
Moser, B. D., Peo, E. R. Jr, Crenshaw, T. D. and Cunningham, P. J. 1976. Effect of Mecadox on protein, utilization in the baby pig. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 256 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1973. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 7th ed.National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oakley, G. A. 1974. Activity of levamisole hydrochloride administered subcutaneously against A. suum infections in pigs. Vet. Rec. 95: 190–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. 1975. Persistence of tetracycline resistance in pig E. coli. Nature, Lond. 258: 628–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th ed.Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Solomons, I. A. 1978. Antibiotics in animal feeds—human and animal safety issues. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1360–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speer, V. C., Vohs, R. L., Catron, D. V., Maddock, H. M. and Culbertson, C. C. 1950. Effect of aureomycin and animal protein factor on healthy pigs. Archs Biochem. 29: 452–453.Google ScholarPubMed
Thrasher, G. W., Shtvely, J. E., Askelson, C. E., Babcock, W. E. and Chalquest, R. R. 1969. Effects of feeding carbadox upon the growth and performance of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 208–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Houweling, C. D. and Gainer, J. H. 1978. Public health concerns relative to the use of subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in animal feeds. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1413–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlstrom, R. C. 1959. Effect of sodium fluoride and hygromycin on growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, J. T., Jensen, A. H., Bajjalieh, N. H. and Ladwig, V. D. 1976. Effects of methyl-3-(2-quinoxalinylmethylene)carbazate-N1, N 4-dioxide on nitrogen and energy digestibility n i and performance of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 375–380.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R., Spear, M. L. and Switzer, W. P. 1973. Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection, pyrantel treatment and protein nutrition on performance of pigs exposed to soil containing Ascaris suum ova. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 894–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed