Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:53:54.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of monosodium l glutamate on diet palatability and piglet performance during the suckling and weaning periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. Gatel
Affiliation:
Institut Technique des Céréales et des Fourrages, Pouline, Villerable, 41100 Vendome, France
P. Guion
Affiliation:
Societé Orsan, 16 rue Ballu, F 75009 Paris, France
Get access

Abstract

The effect of monosodium L glutamate (MSG) on diet palatability and piglet performance during the suckling and weaning periods was studied in the course of five successive experiments involving a total of 230 litters during the suckling period and 120 pens of seven piglets during the post-weaning period. During the suckling period, the addition of 5 g MSG per kg diet led to a significant 0·36 proportional increase of creep food intake from the 18th day post farrowing. However, no increase in weaning weight was observed subsequent to the intake of the diet with added MSG. Moreover, in an experiment where MSG was added with an associated commercial flavour, no flavour enhancing effect of MSG was detectable. Few health problems were encountered at weaning and the number of scouring piglets was not related to one particular diet. During the first 13 days after weaning the addition of MSG to the diet increased daily food intake by proportionately 0·1 (P < 0·01) as well as growth rate by proportionately 0·07 (P < 0·01). Moreover, the addition of MSG to the diet was more effective with piglets of low weaning weight and thus contradicted the classical relationship between post-weaning performance and weaning weight. Finally, in an experiment where weaning occurred at lower ambient temperature, no improvement of post-weaning performance was observed following the addition of MSG.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aherne, F. X., Danielsen, V. and Nielsen, H. E. 1982. The effects of creep feeding on pre- and post-weaning pig performance. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 32: 155160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumaitre, A. 1978. Palatability of piglet feeds: trial methods and practical results. First International Symposium on Palatability and Flavor Use in Animal Feeds, Zurich, pp. 8695.Google Scholar
Aumaitre, A. and Salmon-Legagneur, E. 1961. Influence de l'alimentation complémentaire sur la croissance du porcelet avant le sevrage. Annales de Zootechnie 10: 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumaitre, A. and Seve, B. 1984. Adaptations digestives chez le jeune porcelet. In Physiologie et Pathologie Perinatales Chez les Animaux de Ferme (ed. Jarrige, R.), pp. 143151. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Bekaert, H. 1966. Etude de quelques facteurs exercant une influence sur la consommation des jeunes porcelets. Revue d'Agriculture, Bruxelles 19: 13311349.Google Scholar
Beutler, H. O. 1985. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. 3rd ed. Vol. 8 (ed. Bergmeyer, H. U.), pp. 369376. Verlag Chemie, New York.Google Scholar
Beutler, H. A. and Michal, G. 1974. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. 2nd ed. Vol. 4 (ed. Bergmeyer, H. U.), pp. 17081713. Verlag Chemie, New York.Google Scholar
Danielsen, V. 1982. Some factors influencing creep feed intake. 33rd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Henson, J. N., Bogdonoff, P. D. and Thrasher, G. W. 1962. Levels of monosodium glutamate in pig starter preference. Journal of Animal Science 21: 9991000 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Institut Technique des Céréales et des Fourrages — Institut Technique de Porc. 1987. Tables d'Alimentation pour les Pores. ITCF-ITP, Paris, 32 p.Google Scholar
Kawamura, Y. and Halpern, B. P. 1987. Recent developments in umami research. In Umami: A Basic Taste (ed. Kawamura, Y. and Kare, M. R.). Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Umami, Hawaï; 1985, pp. 637642. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Le dividich, J. 1981. Effects of environmental temperature on the growth rates of early-weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science 8: 7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibbrandt, V. D., Ewan, R. C., Speer, V. C. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1975. Effect of weaning and age at weaning on baby pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 40: 10771080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B., Newby, T. J., Stokes, C. R. and Bourne, F. J. 1982. The significance of dietary antigens in the aetiology of post-weaning diarrhoea. Proceedings of the 7th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Mexico (ed. Necoechen, R. R., Pigoan, C., Casarin, A. and Guzman, M.), p. 11.Google Scholar
Okai, D. B., Aherne, F. X. and Hardin, R. T. 1976. Effects of creep and starter composition on feed intake and performance of young pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56: 573586.Google Scholar
Russo, V. 1971. Effeto del glutammato monosodico sul l'appetibilita dei mangimi di svezzamento nei suinetti in fase di allattamento. Rivista di Suinicoltura 9: 5358.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1971. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
Thrasher, G. W., Henson, J. N. and Bogdonoff, P. D. 1961. Effect of glutamic acid salts upon pig starter acceptance. Journal of Animal Science 20: 954 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Thrasher, G. W., Henson, J. N. and Bodgonoff, P. D. 1963. Effects of monosodium glutamate on pig prestarter and starter acceptance. Feedstuffs 35: June 22, p. 26.Google Scholar
Wahlstrom, R. C., Hauser, L. A. and Libal, G. W. 1974. Effects of low lactose whey, skim milk and sugar on diet palatability and performance of early weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 38: 12671271.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, S. and Kimizuka, A. 1979. Psychometric studies on the taste of monosodium glutamate. In Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology (ed. Filer, L. J.), pp. 3554. Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar