Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:15:52.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of early experience on the post-weaning acceptance of whole grain wheat by fine-wool Merino lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. J. Lynch ,
R. G. Keogh ,
R. L. Elwin ,
G. C. Green  and
B. E. Mottershead
J. J. Lynch
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Private Mail Bag, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia, 2350
R. G. Keogh
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Private Mail Bag, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia, 2350
R. L. Elwin
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Private Mail Bag, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia, 2350
G. C. Green
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Private Mail Bag, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia, 2350
B. E. Mottershead
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Private Mail Bag, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia, 2350
Get access

Abstract

Groups of Merino lambs were exposed to wheat at different ages, for different durations, and with or without their mothers, in two experiments. Acceptance of wheat was tested during the week following weaning.

In experiment 1 the mothers had never eaten wheat; all but one group were exposed without their mothers. Lambs showed more interest in wheat at 1 to 2 weeks of age than at any other age. The only group in which there was good acceptance of wheat during testing was the group which was exposed with their mothers. The latter had been given wheat for the first time in the week prior to the lamb's exposure. The average intake of this group in 2.5 h of testing (0.5 h per day for 5 days) was 290 g per head.

In experiment 2, groups of lambs, together with their mothers who were experienced in eating wheat, had uncontrolled access to wheat trailed on the ground for different periods within the first 4 weeks after birth. Lambs in one group had access to wheat for 1 to 5 days following birth.

All lambs in experiment 2 ate wheat during testing and there were no differences in either intake or feeding times between groups. Mean intake of all groups during the 5 day test period was 810 g per head.

The results demonstrate the importance of early experience and in particular maternal influences in determining the subsequent acceptance of a wheat supplement by lambs. The results also raise questions concerning not only the nature, but also the extent of maternal influences on dietary selection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, G. W. and Bush, I. G. 1968. Observations on non-feeding in groups of hand-fed sheep. Field Sta. Rec. Div. Plant Ind. CSIRO (Aust.) Canberra 7: 47–56.Google Scholar
Bergerud, A. T. and Nolan, M. J. 1970. Food habits of hand-reared caribou, Rangifer tarandus L. in Newfoundland. Oikos 21: 348–350.Google Scholar
Denenberg, V. H. 1969. The effects of early experience. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals. (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 95–129. 2nd ed. Bailliere, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
Denenberg, V. H. and Bell, R. W. 1960. Critical periods for the effects of infantile experience on adult learning. Science, N.Y. 131: 227–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. 1976. Learning to eat by following the mother in moose calves. Am. Midi. Nat. 96: 229–232.Google Scholar
Ewer, R. F. 1963. The behaviour of the meerkat, Suricata suricatta (Schreber). Z. Tierpsychol. 20: 570–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. W. and Stelzner, D. 1966. Behavioural effects of differential early experience in the dog. Anim. Behav. 14: 273–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galef, B. G. and Henderson, P. W. 1972. Mother's milk: a determinant of the feeding preferences of weaning rat pups. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 78: 213–219.Google Scholar
Graham, C. A., Pern, C. and Linehan, K. L. 1977. Individual daily consumption of a medicated bloat block. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 17: 562–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, E. H. 1959. Imprinting. Sconce, N.Y. 130: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, J. 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 1. The effect of previous experience of solid food, and the physical form of the diet, on the development of food intake after weaning. Anim. Prod. 13: 15–24.Google Scholar
Juwarini, E., Howard, B., Siebert, B. D., Lynch, J. J. and El Win, R. L. 1981. Variation in the wheat intake of individual sheep measured by use of labelled grain: behavioural influences. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 21: 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, M. 1965. Newly acquired pre-cultural behaviour of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshina islet. Primates 6: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Caroline and Maciver, R. M. 1980. The effects of maternal influences on sheep: breed differences in grazing, resting and courtship behaviour. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6: 33–48.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. 1965. The effect of concentration of milk substitute on the performance of artificially reared lambs. Anim. Prod. 7: 325–332.Google Scholar
Levine, S. 1957. Infantile experience and resistance to physiological stress. Science, N.Y. 126: 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, S. 1962. Plasma-free corticosteroid response to electric shock in rats stimulated in infancy. Science, N.Y. 135: 795–796.Google Scholar
Lobato, J. F. P. and Pearce, G. R. 1980. Responses to molasses-urea blocks of grazing sheep and sheep in yards. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 20: 417–421.Google Scholar
Lobato, J. F. P., Pearce, G. R. and Beilharz, R. G. 1980a. Effect of early familiarization with dietary supplements on the subsequent ingestion of molasses-urea blocks by sheep. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6: 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobato, J. F. P., Pearce, G. R. and Tribe, D. E. 1980b. Measurement of the variability in intake by sheep of oat grain, hay and molasses-urea blocks using chromic oxide as a marker. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 20: 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, G. W. 1961. Infantile handling and development in Siamese kittens. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 54: 284–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P. D. and Arnold, G. W. 1974. Behavioural relationships between Merino ewes and lambs during the four weeks after birth. Anim. Prod. 19: 169–176.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Norton, B. W., Murray, R. M., Ball, F. M., Roseby, F. B., Rohan-Jones, W., Hill, M. K. and Leng, R. A. 1975. Body weight and wool production in grazing sheep given access to a supplement of urea and molasses: intake of supplement-response relationships. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. and Cowey, A. 1963. The aetiology of food reward in monkeys. Anim. Behav. 11: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar