Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:51:14.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of breed of cattle on energy requirements for growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. M. B. Chestnutt ,
R. Marsh ,
J. G. Wilson ,
T. A. Stewart ,
T. A. McCullough  and
T. McCallion
D. M. B. Chestnutt
Affiliation:
Crop and Animal Husbandry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
R. Marsh
Affiliation:
Crop and Animal Husbandry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
J. G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Crop and Animal Husbandry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
T. A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Greenmount Agricultural and Horticultural College, Antrim
T. A. McCullough
Affiliation:
Loughry College of Agriculture and Food Technology, Cookstown, Co. Tyrone
T. McCallion
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Belfast
Get access

Summary

With the object of comparing the energy requirements of cattle of different breeds a total of 108 animals, representing three maturity types, were individually fed at two levels of intake over three 12-week periods commencing at 250, 375 and 500 kg live weight in a co-ordinated experiment. The three breeds compared were Aberdeen Angus cross, Hereford × British Friesian and British Friesian. Animals were offered a 50:50 hay: concentrate ration at two levels of feeding; one level was designed to give 0·7 kg gain daily and the other 75 to 80% of this intake.

Though the relative performance of breeds differed at the three centres, overall average live-weight gain did not differ significantly between breeds. Feed conversion efficiency dropped from 8·55 kg dry matter per kg gain in the first period to 16·95 kg in the third period, but differences in conversion ratio between breeds were not significant.

Carcass measurements taken at slaughter immediately after the third test period indicated higher killing-out percentages and higher fat percentages in the Angus cross than in the British Friesian with Hereford × Friesian intermediate. Differences in energy needs for gain among the three breeds, predicted by apportioning ME intake to maintenance and gain using a multiple regression technique, were greater than differences calculated from carcass composition and published energy requirements for fat and protein deposition. The limitations of the use of the multiple regression technique for this purpose are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 109 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, H. C, Carpenter, Z. L., King, G. T. and Butler, O. D. 1968. Relationships of carcass weight, conformation and carcass measurements and their use in predicting beef carcass cutability. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 604–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Clapperton, J. L. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 19: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L.Clapperton, J. L. and Martin, A. K. 1966. The heat of combustion of the urine of sheep and cattle in relation to its chemical composition and to diet. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1966. The fasting metabolism of cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callow, E. H. 1962. The relationship between the weight of a tissue in a single joint and the total weight of the tissue in a side of beef. Anim. Prod. 4: 37–46.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J. and Robinson, J. J. 1969. A study of the energy requirements of weaned lambs. Anim. Prod. 11: 389–397.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Meyer, J. H. and Lofgreen, G. P. 1959. The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashizume, T., Kaishio, Y., Ambo, S., Morimoto, H., Masubuchi, T., Abe, M., Horii, S., Tanaka, K., Hamada, T. and TAKAHASHI, S., 1962. Bull natn. Inst. agric. Sci., Tokyo, Ser. G., No. 21.Google Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. 1974. Meat Science (2nd ed.) Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1970. The utilization of dietary energy for maintenance and for fat and protein deposition in young growing sheep. Proc. 5th Symp. E.A.A.P. Vitznau, 1970. Publ. 13: 121–124.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Brockway, J. M. and Smith, J. S. 1974. Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 1. The irrelevance of fasting metabolism. Anim. Prod. 19: 127–139.Google Scholar