Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T05:17:42.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of breed, crossbreeding and other factors on variation in fleece and skin traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Woolliams  and
G. Wiener
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organization, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
G. Wiener
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organization, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Breed and crossbreeding significantly affected variation in 10 fleece, follicle density and fibre diameter traits in 12-week-old lambs. The breeds involved were the Scottish Blackface, South Country Cheviot, Welsh Mountain, Lincoln Longwool, Southdown and Tasmanian Merino, but the last only by rams.

The Southdown came closest to the Merino in affecting density and diameter traits although the Merino crosses remained clearly distinguishable by their high follicle density. The Lincoln and Blackface crosses were notable for their long fibres and the Blackface crosses also had the least dense follicle and coarsest primary fibres. The coarsest secondary fibres were from Lincoln and Cheviot crosses. Heterosis estimates were obtained for crosses involving the Blackface, Cheviot, Welsh and Lincoln breeds. Significant heterosis was present in a wide range of traits but was not apparent in all crosses. Maternal differences were evident for many of the traits but with density these differences were apparently related to maternal effects on live weight of the lamb. The sex of the lamb, its birth type and rearing and its 12-week live weight significantly affected many of the traits.

Among breeds and crosses a strong relationship was found between fibre density and average fibre diameter. The relationship suggested that breed variation in total fibre area per unit area of skin was small compared with the breed variation in its components. Fleece weight per unit area was most closely related to mean fibre length.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 417 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, G. H. and Turner, Helen N. 1968. Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep. II. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters for some production traits in Merino ewes and an analysis of the possible effects of selection on them. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 303–322.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. and Clarke, W. H. 1957a. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Australian Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. and Clarke, W. H. 1957b. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of some non-Merino breeds of sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 109–119.Google Scholar
Chirgwin, B. J. C. 1969. Study of inheritance of birthcoat. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1964. Modification of fleece development in Blackface sheep by variation in pre- and post-natal nutrition. Anim. Prod. 6: 155–167.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. S. 1952. Growth of wool fibres in sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 3: 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. S. and Short, B. F. 1960. The biology of the fleece. Anim. Res. Lab. Tech. Project No. 3, Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Orgn, Aust.Google Scholar
McGuirk, B. J., Bourke, M. E. and Manwaring, J. M. 1978. Hybrid vigour and lamb production. 2. Effects on survival and growth of first-cross lambs, and on wool and body measurements of hogget ewes. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 18: 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, A. L. 1958. Genetic variation and covariation in productive characters of New Zealand Romney Marsh sheep. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 1: 104–123.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. 1968. Wool Growth. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. and Wilson, D. T. 1972. Fleece characteristics and postnatal fleece development in Finnish Landrace × Merino sheep. Anim. Prod. 15: 75–84.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. and Short, B. F. 1961. The influence of nutritional level during prenatal and early post-natal life on adult fleece and body characters. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 176–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1956. Measurement as an aid to selection in breeding sheep for wool production. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 24: 87–118.Google Scholar
Turner, Helen N., Brooker, M. G. and Dolling, C. H. S. 1970. Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep. III. Single character selection for high and low values of wool weight and its components. Aust. J. agric. Res. 21: 955–984.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1967. A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Anim. Prod. 9: 177–195.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. and Hayter, Susan. 1974. Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Anim. Prod. 19:47–65.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. and Slee, J. 1965. Maternal and genetic influences on follicle and fleece development in Lincoln and Welsh Mountain sheep—a study involving egg transfer. Anim. Prod. 7: 333–345.Google Scholar