Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T03:26:03.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect on the performance of dairy cattle of plant protein concentration and of urea or urea-phosphate supplementation in the diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Bruckental
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
H. Tagari
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
S. Amir
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Hanna Kennit
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
S. Zamwell
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Sixty Israeli-Friesian cows were allocated, after calving, to five treatment groups of 12 cows per group according to the concentration and source of crude protein (CP) in the concentrate. Three groups received all their protein from plant sources: a basal control group (BP) was given concentrate containing 92 g CP per kg dry matter (DM), a medium-protein group (MP) was given a diet with soya-bean meal (SBM) added to give a CP concentration of 143 g/kg DM, and a high-protein group (HP) was given a diet with SBM added to give a concentration of 180 g/kg DM. Two groups were given the basal concentrate supplemented with urea (MU) or urea phosphate (MUP) up to approximately the same CP level as the MP group. The only roughage used was vetch-oats hay at a level of 350 g/kg total DM intake. The cows were given the experimental diets ad libitum throughout lactation.

No difference was found between treatments in DM intake (kg/day), mean milk and fat-corrected milk (FCM; 40 g fat per kg) yields (kg/day), milk protein concentration, days from calving to conception or services per conception, during the entire lactation period. However, FCM yields during 60 days after calving were significantly higher for cows given the CP-supplemented diets than for the BP group. The FCM yield of the cows given the HP concentrate was higher than for those given the other concentrate mixtures only during the first 15 days after calving. Milk fat concentration was higher in cows given the BP and HP concentrates than in those given the MP ration, but only a trend in this respect was observed when part of the plant protein was replaced by urea or urea phosphate.

The rate of body-weight loss after calving tended to increase with increase in amount of plant protein in the diet but was highest for the cows given the diets supplemented with non-protein nitrogen. Later in lactation, the body-weights of cows given the MP, HP and MUP diets increased immediately after they reached their lowest weight whilst cows given the BP and MU diets started gaining weight 165 and 120 days after calving, respectively.

Rumen ammonia-N and blood urea-N concentrations (mg/1) for treatments BP, MP, HP, MU and MUP were: 56 and 101; 120 and 226; 143 and 269; 191 and 227; and 179 and 212, respectively. The relationship between rumen ammonia concentrations, blood urea concentrations and CP utilization for the different treatments is discussed. Supplying urea as urea phosphate tended to improve performance by an increase in annual milk and milk protein yields as well as in live-weight gain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abou Akkada, A. R. and Sayed Osman, H. E. 1967. The use of ruminal ammonia and blood urea as an index of the nutritive value of protein in some food- stuffs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69: 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BINES, J. A. 1979. Voluntary food intake. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow (ed. Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.), pp. 2348. Granada Publishing, St Albans.Google Scholar
BROSTER, W. H. and OLDHAM, J. D. 1977. Protein quantity and quality for the UK dairy cow. In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment (ed. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 123153. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
BROSTER, W. H. and THOMAS, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 4969. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURROUGHS, W., NELSON, D. K. and MERTENS, D. R. 1975. Protein physiology and its application in the lactating cow: the metabolizable protein feeding standard. Journal of Animal Science 41: 933944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CLARK, J. H. 1975. Lactational responses to postruminal administration of proteins and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 11781197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DRORI, D. and FOLMAN, Y. 1970. Protein requirements of lactating cows. Proceedings of 19th International Dairy Congress, Sydney, Australia, p. 533.Google Scholar
EDWARDS, J. S. and BARTLEY, E. E. 1979. Soybean meal or starea for microbial protein synthesis or milk production with rations above thirteen percent natural protein. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 732739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMERY, R. S. 1978. Feeding for increased milk protein. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 825828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOLDAGER, J. and HUBER, J. T. 1979. Influence of protein percent and source on cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 954964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOLMAN, Y., NEUMARK, H., KAIM, M. and KAUFMANN, W. 1981. Performance, rumen and blood metabolites in high-yielding cows fed varying protein percents and protected soybean. Journal of Dairy Science 64: 759768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLTER, J. B., BYRNE, J. A. and SCHWAB, C. G. 1982. Crude protein for high milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 11751188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KWAN, K., COPPOCK, C. E., LAKE, G. B., FETTMAN, M. J., CHASE, L. E. and MCDOWELL, R. E. 1977. Use of urea by early postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 17061724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council., 1978. Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 3, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Academy of Sciences National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
OLDHAM, J. D. and SMITH, T. 1982. Protein-energy interrelationships for growing and for lactating cattle. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Es, A. J. H. Van), pp. 103130. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLDHAM, J. D., SUTTON, J. D. and MCALLAN, A. B. 1979. Protein digestion and utilization by dairy cows. Annales de Recherche Veterinaire 10: 290293.Google ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. 1970. Nitrogen utilization by the young ruminant. Proceedings 4th Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), University of Nottingham, pp. 2035. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
PEREZ, C. G., WARNER, R. G. and LOOSLI, J. K. 1967. Evaluation of urea-phosphate as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 26: 810819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PRESTON, R. L. 1972. Protein requirements for growing and lactating ruminants. In University of Nottingham Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers: 6 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 2237. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
PRIGGE, E. C, JOHNSON, R. R., OWENS, F. N. and WILLIAMS, D. E. 1976. Utilization of nitrogen from ground high moisture and dry corn by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 43: 705711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REID, J. T., MOE, P. W. and TYRRELL, H. F. 1966. Energy and protein requirements of milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 49: 215223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RITCHIE, N. S., PARKINS, J. H. and HEMINGWAY, R. G. 1972. Urea phosphate. A dietary source of non-protein nitrogen with low potential toxicity to ruminants. British Veterinary Journal 12: LXXVIII–LXXXI.Google Scholar
SATTER, L. D. and ROFFLER, R. E. 1975. Nitrogen requirement and utilization in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 12191237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis System. 1982. Statistical Analysis System User's Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
STEEL, R. G. D. and TORRIE, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
TAGARI, H. 1969. Comparison of the efficiency of proteins contained in lucerne hay and soya-bean meal for sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 23: 455470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TAGARI, H., BEN-GHEDALIA, D., SHEVACH, Y. and BONDI, A. 1971. Effects of the addition of starch on the utilization by sheep of the protein and crude fibre contained in lucerne hay and soya-bean meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 11: 413425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAGARI, H., BEN-GHEDALIA, D. and ZAMWELL, S. 1976. Urea phosphate as a partial protein replacer in sheep concentrate diets. Animal Production 23: 8188.Google Scholar
TAGARI, H., DROR, Y., ASCARELLI, I. and BONDI, A. 1964. The influence of levels of protein and starch in rations of sheep on the utilization of protein. British Journal of Nutrition 18: 333356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Horn, H. H., Zometa, C. A., Wilcox, C. J., Marshall, S. P. and Harris, B. 1979. Complete rations for dairy cattle. VIII. Effect of percent and source of protein on milk yield and ration digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 10861093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O and B books, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
Vik-Mo, L., Emery, R. S. and Huber, J. T. 1974. Milk protein production in cows abomasally infused with casein or glucose. Journal of Dairy Science 57: 869877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlt, J. E. and Clark, J. H. 1978. Nutritional value of urea versus preformed protein for ruminants. I. Lactation of dairy cows fed corn based diets containing supplemental nitrogen from urea and/or soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 902915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar