Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T10:05:57.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of work applied at different stages of lactation on milk production, reproduction and live-weight change of F1 crossbred dairy cows used for draught

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

E. Zerbini  and
Alemu Gebre Wold
E. Zerbini
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Alemu Gebre Wold
Affiliation:
Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

This study examined whether work applied at different stages of lactation had any effect on reproduction of cows under two feeding regimes. Twenty-four F1 crossbred dairy cows (12 Friesian × Boran and 12 Simmental × Boran) were allocated one of two diets (H + 3: natural pasture hay + 3 kg concentrate per day; and H + 5: natural pasture hay + 5 kg concentrate per day) and one of three work treatments — starting 45 days (D45), 90 days (D90) and 135 days (D135) post partum — using a principal component analysis score based on milk yield, live weight, calving interval and parity. Cows pulled sledges for 50 days (pull = 108 N per 100 kg live weight). Over the experimental period of 315 days, cows on diet H + 5 travelled a similar distance and produced amounts of fat-corrected milk (FCM) similar to those of cows on diet H + 3. Total intake of dry matter per kg live weight 0·75 was higher for cows on diet H + 5 than for cows on diet H + 3 and was similar across work times. Hay dry-matter intake was greater for the H + 3 group than for the H + 5 group at 180 days post partum and thereafter. Cows on diet H + 5 lost less weight in early lactation and gained more in mid and late lactation than cows on diet H + 3. During the work period, live-weight change was similar across diets but it was different between work treatments D45 and D135. The interval from calving to conception decreased by 63 and 101 days when start of work was delayed from D45 to D90 and from D45 to D 135, respectively. Output/input ratios of metabolizable energy equivalents were 0·35 for H + 3 and 0·37 for H + 5 diet, and 0·34, 0·37 and 0·40 for work times D45, D90 and D135, respectively. These results indicate that work started in early lactation significantly increased days to conception and decreased overall productivity of lactating working cows. Farmers must weigh the relative importance and cost of delayed ploughing against those of delayed oestrus or against the cost of borrowing draught power.

Keywords

conceptioncowsdraught animalslactationlive-weight change
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , December 1999 , pp. 473 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, E., Zerbini, E. and Gemeda, T. 1995. Effect of work on estrus cycle length and ovarian activity in crossbred dairy cows already cycling. Paper presented at the third National Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, 27-29 April 1995, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Australian Agricultural Council. 1990. Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants. Ruminant subcommittee, CSIRO, Australia.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution. 1989. Determinations of fat content of milk and milk products (Gerber method). British Standard BS 696: part 2. British Standards Institution, UK.Google Scholar
Eley, R. M., Thatcher, W. W., Bazer, F. W., Wilcox, C. J., Becker, R.B., Head, H. H. and Adkinson, R. W. 1978. Development of the conceptus in the bovine. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 467–473.Google Scholar
Gemeda, T., Zerbini, E., Wold, A. G. and Demissie, D. 1995. Effect of draught work on performance and metabolism of crossbred cows. 1. Effect of work and diet on body-weight change, body condition, lactation and productivity. Animal Science 60: 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gryseels, G. and Anderson, F. M. 1985. Use of crossbred dairy cows as draught animals: experiences from the Ethiopian highlands. In Research methodology for livestock on farm trials. Proceedings of a workshop held March 25-28 at Aleppo, Syria. pp. 237–258. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. 1985. A review of the nutrient requirements of draught oxen. In Draught animal power for production (ed. Copland, J. W.), ACIAR proceedings no. 10, pp. 59–63. James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland.Google Scholar
Louw, B.P. and Thomas, C. R. 1988. The influence of loss and gain of body mass on ovarian activity in beef cows. South African Journal of Animal Science 18: 1–7.Google Scholar
Matthewman, R. W., Dijkman, J. T. and Zerbini, E. 1990. The management and husbandry of male and female draught animals: research achievements and needs. Paper presented at the fourth workshop of the West African Animal Traction Network entitled ‘Research for development on animal traction in West Africa’ held on 9-13 July 1990, in Kano, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference book no. 433. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK.Google Scholar
Pyne, G.T. 1932. The determination of milk proteins by formaldehyde titration. Biochemical Journal 26: 1006–1014.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, fourth edition, vol. 2. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Teleni, E., Boniface, A. N., Sutherland, S. and Entwistle, K.W. 1989. The effect of depletion of body reserve nutrients on reproduction in Bos indiens cattle. Draught Animal Power Project bulletin no. 8, pp. 1–10. James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Robertson, J. B. 1985. Analysis of forage and fibrous foods. Laboratory manual for animal science no. 613. Cornell University, USA.Google Scholar
Zerbini, E., Gemeda, T., Franceschini, R., Sherington, J. and Wold, A. G. 1993. Reproductive performance of Fı crossbred dairy cows used for draught: effect of work and diet supplementation. Animal Production 57: 361–368.Google Scholar
Zerbini, E., Wold, A. G. and Demissie, D. 1996a. Effect of draught force and diet on dry-matter intake, milk production and live-weight change in non-pregnant and pregnant cows. Animal Science 62: 225–231.Google Scholar
Zerbini, E., Wold, A. G. and Gemeda, T. 1996b. Effect of dietary repletion on reproductive activity in cows after a long anoestrous period. Animal Science 62: 217–223.Google Scholar