Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T03:38:30.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of supplementary protein on the performance of dairy cows offered grass silage ad libitum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Laird ,
A. T. Leggate  and
M. E. Castle
R. Laird
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
A. T. Leggate
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
Get access

Abstract

Sixty-four lactating dairy cows (Ayrshire, British Friesian and Shorthorn × Ayrshire) were offered grass silage with a dry-matter content of 258 g/kg, and containing 75 g/kg digestible crude protein and 64·6% digestible organic matter in the dry matter for an average period of 16·7 weeks. The control and supplemented groups, each of 32 cows, received concentrates containing on a fresh basis 14% and 18% crude protein respectively which were offered at the rate of 0·4 kg/kg milk for yields above 2·3 kg/day. The mean daily yields of milk were 17·4 and 19·5 kg/cow, silage dry-matter intake 8·16 and 9·00 kg/cow per day and concentrate dry-matter intake 5·36 and 5·94 kg/cow per day on the control and supplemented treatments respectively and these differences were highly significant. The treatments had no significant effects on milk yield and composition in the post-experimental grazing period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 151 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, A. H., Newell, D. W. and Castle, M. E. 1979. A comparison between supplements to silage of high digestibility offered to dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci. 34: 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. H. 1969. The establishment of a laboratory procedure for the in vitro determination of digestibility. W. Scotl. Agric. Coll. Res. Bull. No. 42.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H. and McGowan, Mary. 1969. The assessment of the nutritive value of silage by determination of in vitro digestibility on homogenates prepared from fresh undried silage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1969. The effect of level of protein in silage on the intake and production of dairy cows. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1976. Silage and milk production. A comparison between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977. Comparison of results from longer term dairy cattle feeding experiments with calculated N-requirements. Proc. 2nd int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Flevohov. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Publ. No. 22, pp. 142–146.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1976. Nutrient allowances and composition of feeding stuffs for ruminants. ADAS Advisory Paper, No. 11, 2nd ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1962. The effect of type of concentrate on milk production when silage is the only roughage offered to cows. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 17: 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar