Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T18:42:32.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of method of rearing on the social behaviour of Scottish Blackface hoggets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. F. Hunter
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Edinburgh 12
G. E. Davies
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Edinburgh 12
Get access

Summary

Four groups of Scottish Blackface ewe lambs were reared in the period 11–52 weeks old under different regimes. The regimes differed in the age of the lambs at which they were separated from their dams and whether having been separated they were together in a field and/or penned together n i a sheep shed.

These regimes caused differences in social behaviour among the four groups and also resulted in the groups adopting different parts (home ranges) of an enclosed 350 acre hill pasture. The various home ranges within the pasture are dissimilar environments and it is argued that home range and method-of-rearing effects will be confounded making statistical comparisons between the different rearing treatments impossible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hunter, R. F., 1960. Aims and methods in grazing-behaviour studies. Proc. 8th int. Grassl. Congr., p. 454.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. F., 1963. Home range behaviour in Scottish Blackface sheep. Proc. Brit. Ecol. Soc. Symp. ‘Grazing’. Bangor 1962. Ed. D. J. Crisp.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. F. & Milner, C., 1963. The behaviour of individual, related and groups of South Country Cheviot sheep. Anim. Behav. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C., 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar