Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:47:39.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of environmental temperature and feeding level on energy and protein retention of individual housed pregnant sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. Kemp ,
M. W. A. Verstegen ,
J. M. F. Verhagen  and
W. van der Hel
B. Kemp
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Zodiac, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. W. A. Verstegen
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Zodiac, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. M. F. Verhagen
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Zodiac, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. van der Hel
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Zodiac, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were performed to study the effect of ambient temperature and feeding level on energy and protein metabolism of individually housed pregnant sows. In experiment 1, 12 pregnant animals were used. The stage of pregnancy at the start of the experiment ranged from 34 to 41 days. In experiment 2, 10 pregnant animals were used. The stage of pregnancy at the start of the experiment ranged from 38 to 47 days. In each experiment two groups of animals were used. Each group of five or six animals was individually tethered in one of two identical calorimeters and given one of two feeding levels. At the high feeding level the animals received about 1·35 × maintenance. At the low feeding level the animals received about 1·1 × maintenance. The temperature in experiment 1 changed stepwise in both calorimeters by 3°C every 5 to 7 days from 21 to 12°C and then in reverse order. Temperature in experiment 2 changed stepwise in both calorimeters by 2°C every 3·5 days from 25°C to 11°C and then in reverse order.

Energy gain was negative in animals at the low feeding level at the temperatures below 15 to 18°C. At the high feeding level sows lost energy at 12°C or lower in experiment 2. Protein gain was depressed by both low feeding level and low temperatures. Energy balance was depressed by about 90 kJ/kg M0·75 per day at the lower feeding level and by 19 kJ/kg M0·75 per day per °C below thermoneutrality. Protein gain was depressed by about 26 g/day at the low feeding level and by about 6 g/day per °C below thermoneutrality. Fat gain at low feeding level was depressed by about 92 g/day and by about 154 g/day at the lowest temperature. At low feeding level below the critical temperature, gain of fat was negative. Feeding levels used in these experiments did not supply sufficient energy for energy equilibrium or fat gain for the pregnant sow kept for longer periods below the thermoneutral zone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 275 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1984. Principles and strategies involved in the nutrition of the sow. 35th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, the Hague.Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. and Start, I. B. 1971. The influence of environmental temperature and plane of nutrition on heat losses from groups of growing pigs. Animal Production 13: 285–294.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A. 1982. Nutrition and reproduction. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxroft, G. R.), pp. 603–619. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geerse, C. and Mesu, J. J. 1982. De energetische efficiëntie van de melkvorming bij zeugen. Doctoraalscriptie, Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Geuyen, T. P. A., Verhagfn, J. M. F. and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1984. Effect of housing and temperature on metabolic rate of pregnant sows. Animal Production 38: 477–485.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and Closf, W. H. 1977. The effect of climatic variables on the energy metabolism and associated aspects of productivity in the pig. In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment (ed. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 51–73. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and Mount, L. E. 1967. Heat loss from groups of growing pigs under various conditions of environmental temperature and air movement. Animal Production 9: 435–452.Google Scholar
DeB., Hovell. F. D., Gordon, J. G. and MacPherson, R. M. 1977. Thin sows. 2. Observations on the energy and nitrogen exchanges of thin and normal sows in environmental temperatures of 20 and 5°C. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 523–533.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. M. F., Versthgen, M. W. A., Geuyen, T. P. A. and Kemp, B. 1986. Effect of environmental temperature of pregnant sows. Zeitschrift fur Tierphysiologie, Tiererndhrung und Futtermittelkunde 55: 246–256.Google Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A. 1971. Influence of environmental temperature on energy metabolism of growing pigs housed individually and in groups. Mededelingen, Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 71–2.Google Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A. 1984. Energy and nutrient requirements of sows for pregnancy. 35th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, The Hague, Paper NP3.Google Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A., Close, W. H., Start, I. B. and Mount, L. E. 1973. The effects of environmental temperature and plane of nutrition on heat loss, energy retention and deposition of protein and fat in groups of growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verstegen, M. W. A. and Hel, W. Van Der. 1974. The effects of temperature and type of floor on metabolic rate and effective critical temperature in groups of growing pigs. Animal Production 18: 1–11.Google Scholar
Young, B. A. 1975. Some physiological costs of cold climates. Special Report, University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 175.Google Scholar