Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T14:21:14.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary energy content at different stages of growth on performance of intact male cattle†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Levy ,
Z. Holzer  and
D. Ilan
D. Levy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
D. Ilan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

Six groups of Israeli-Friesian intact male calves were studied over growth periods of 200 to 300 kg, 300 to 400 kg, and 400 to 500 kg live weight. Different ratios (85: 15, 70: 30 and 50: 50) of concentrate to roughage were compared. Two groups received the same ratio (85: 15 or 70: 30) throughout the experiment. In the other groups, the proportion of concentrates was progressively increased or decreased.

Live-weight gain in the first period ranged from 759 to 1013 g/day, i n the second period from 1095 to 1239 g/day and in the third period from 831 to 922 g/day. Overall rate of gain was highest in the groups receiving a constant ratio, regardless of the ratio used. Increasing the proportion of concentrates as the calves became heavier, which is common practice in Europe, did not improve performance and decreasing the proportion reduced performance. Only at 200 to 300 and at 400 to 500 kg live weight did a concentrate percentage higher than 50 result in improved performance.

Dry-matter intake, relative to live weight, was higher with a ratio of 70: 30 than with one of 85: 15 or of 50: 50 in each period. Animals on a constant ratio of concentrates to roughage gave the most efficient conversion of feed energy to live weight.

There were no significant differences in dressing percentage or in carcass composition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 199 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1962. Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32: 669–686.Google ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. and Wilson, R. S. 1962. The voluntary intake of roughages by steers. Anim.Prod 4: 351–358.Google Scholar
Buysse, F. 1970. Intensive beef production. In Nutrition. Proc. 8th int. Congr., Prague (ed. Masek, J., Osancova, K. and Cuthbertson, D. P.), pp. 747–749. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Drori, D., Levy, D., FOLMAN, Y. an d HOLZER, Z. 1974. Compensatory growth of intensively raised bull calves. II. The effect of feed energy concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 654–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, Z. and Levy, D. 1973. Growth, feed conversion, efficiency and meat yield in Israeli-Friesian and grade Hereford bull calves. Israel J. agric. Res. 23: 31–39.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1972. Processed roughage in diets containing cereals for ruminants. In Cereal Processing and Digestion, pp. 39–52. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Levy, D. and Holzer, Z. 1971. The relative value of concentrates and roughage for fattening cattle. Anim. Prod. 13: 569–579.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Folman, Y. 1975. Effect of concentrate: roughage ratio on the production of beef from Israeli-Friesian bulls slaughtered at different live weights. Anim. Prod. 20: 199–205.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Neumark, H. and Amir, S. 1974. The effects of dietary energy content and level of feeding on the growth of Israeli-Friesian intact male cattle. Anim. Prod. 18: 67–73.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Volcani, R. 1968. The effect of age and live weight on feed conversion and yield of saleable meat of intact Israeli-Friesian male calves. Anim. Prod. 10: 325–330.Google Scholar
Levy, D. and Volcani, R. 1965. [The effect of different proportions of roughage and concentrates in the fattening ration on the rate of gain, feed conversion and body composition of Israeli-Friesian bull calves]. Pamph. Nat. Univ. Inst. Agric, Rehovot, Israel, No. 84.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J. E., Pope, L. S., Walters, L. E. and Urban, K. 1958. Fattening steers and heifers on rations containing different levels of concentrates. Misc. Publs Okla. agric. Exp. Stn, MP 51, pp. 116–121.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 2. Rations varying in energy concentration and physical form. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 1623–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahnish, O. F., Stanley, E. B. and Shillingburg, C. G. 1956. Effects of roughage levels on fattening cattle in Arizona. Bull. Ariz, agric. Exp. Stn, No. 272.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production, p. 313. Pergamon, London.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M., Forbes, T. J. and Irwin, J. H. D. 1969. The utilization by beef cattle of concentrate diets containing different levels of milled barley straw and of protein. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D., Smith, E. F., Baker, F. H. and Cox, R. F. 1961. Effects of roughage-concentrate ratio in cattle fattening rations on gains, feed efficiency, digestion and carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 316–318.Google Scholar