Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:54:51.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of body condition on ovulation rate in the sow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. Hardy  and
G. A. Lodge
B. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.
Get access

Summary

Twenty-four sows from three nutritional regimes imposed until weaning of their third litters were used to investigate the influence of weight and body condition on ovulation rate.

For low-, medium- and high-plane sows respectively, mean corpora lutea numbers at 3 to 6 days post coitus were 13·8±0·78, 16·4±0·87 and 15·2±1·01 (not significantly different); conception rates at first service were 50, 87·5 and 100% percentages prenatal mortality were 36·1±7·95, 67·2±7·26 and 41·7±7·26, and mean numbers of pigs born alive were 9·0±1·19, 5·2±1·09 and 8·8±1·09.

Pooled data indicated no significant effect of body weight but a significant effect of weight loss during the preceding lactation on ovulation rate (P<0–01).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , November 1969 , pp. 505 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burger, J. F. 1952. Sex physiology of pigs. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. Suppl. 2.Google Scholar
Heap, F. C., Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. Influence of plane of nutrition in early pregnancy on the survival and development of embryos in the sow. J. Reprod. Fert. 13: 269–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. W. B. and Young, G. B. 1957. Maternal influences on litter size in pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48: 457–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasley, E. L. 1957. Ovulation, prenatal mortality and litter size in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 335–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, E. H., Mayer, D. T. and Lasley, J. F. 1957. Early embryonic mortality in strain crossed gilts. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 629.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1969. The effects of pattern of feed distribution during the reproductive cycle on the performance of sows. Anim. Prod. 11: 133–133.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., McDonald, I. and Macpherson, R. M. 1961. Weight changes in sows during pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod. 3: 269–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longenecker, D. E., Watte, A. B. and Day, B. N. 1967. Similarity in the number of corpora lutea during two stages of pregnancy in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 1497 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
O'Bannon, R. H., Wallace, H. D., Warnick, A. C. and Combs, G. E. 1966. Influence of energy intake on reproductive performance of gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 706–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, I. H. and Boaz, T. G. 1967. The effect of condition at service and plane of nutrition from service on ovulation, early foetal mortality and nitrogen utilization by the pregnant sow. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Nutrition of Sows. Pig Industry Development Authority, London.Google Scholar
Rathnasabapathy, V., Lasley, J. F. and Mayer, D. T. 1956. Genetic and environmental factors affecting litter size in swine. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 615.Google Scholar
Reitmeyer, J. C. and Sorensen, A. M. 1965. Accessory corpora lutea in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 928 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Self, H. L., Grummer, R. H. and Casida, L. E. 1955. The effects of various sequences of full and limited feeding on the reproductive phenomena in Chester White and Poland China gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 573–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, F. S. and Robertson, G. L. 1953. Some effects of sexual age on reproductive performance in gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 12: 957 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R., Self, H. L. and Casida, L. E. 1957. Effect of flushing for various lengths of time on the ovulation rate of Chester White and Chester White-Poland China crossbred gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 1099 (Abstr.).Google Scholar