Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T16:05:28.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of incomplete nursing in the sow in two environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. S. Whatson  and
J. M. Bertram
T. S. Whatson
Affiliation:
East of Scotland College of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
J. M. Bertram
Affiliation:
East of Scotland College of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

1. Many apparently normal nursings occur in the absence of milk ejection, but little is known about their frequency or causes. The present paper reports an observational study in which the incidence of these incomplete nursings was studied in detail.

2. Nine lactating sows were studied throughout a 5-week lactation in each of two environments. One was a normal commercial farrowing house, and the other a cubicle in which the sow and litter were effectively alone. Extended (3 h) observations were made on each litter at various ages.

3. Twenty-seven per cent of all nursings were found to be incomplete with little difference between the grouped and alone sows. Incomplete nursings often occurred within 40 min of a complete nursing and increased the interval between successive complete nursings. They also occurred most frequently during the 2nd and 3rd weeks post partum.

4. Irrespective of the housing condition the sows initiated the same proportion of all nursings and a similar percentage of these were incomplete.

5. Incomplete nursings appear not to be an artefact caused by crowding many lactating sows together, but they may reflect some form of discomfort of the sow. The problem of real and apparent nursing intervals is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 105 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1955. Studies o n milk production of Large White pigs. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 46: 97–118.Google Scholar
Boaz, T. G. and Walters, A. A. 1966. Weight and well being. Pig Fmg. 81: 79–81.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1977. Some behavioural aspects of milk ejection failure by sows. Br. vet. J. 133: 126–133Google ScholarPubMed
Hartman, D. A., Ludwick, T. M. and Wilson, R. F. 1962. Certain aspects of lactation performance in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 883–886.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P., Baldwin, B. A., Fraser, D. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1975. The behaviour of swine. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.). 3rd ed., pp. 295–329. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Stone, C. C., Brown, M. S. and Waring, G. H. 1974. An ethological means to improve swine production. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 137 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Fraser, D. 1974. The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. II. Vocalization of the sow in relation to suckling behaviour and milk ejection. Br. vet. J. 130: 346–356.Google Scholar