Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:55:30.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and sex differences in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor ,
M. A. Mason  and
T. H. McClelland
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
M. A. Mason
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
T. H. McClelland
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Sheep from the Soay, Southdown, Finnish Landrace and Oxford Down breeds were serially slaughtered at 40, 52, 64 and 76% of their estimated mature body weight. Breed and sex comparisons of muscle distribution wee made at these degrees of maturity. Comparisons were based on 12 individual muscles obtained from the prime retailjoints. Together, these 12 muscles represented about 41 % of total weight ofmuscle in the carcass. Highly significant breed and sex differences in the weight of individual muscles were obtained, but these differences were greatly reduced when values were expressed as a percentage of total muscle weight.

On a percentage basis, there were significant changes with stage of maturity in only three of the muscles studied, although most individual muscles showed an initial percentage decrease with increasing maturity (from 40 to 52%) but almost no change thereafter. Significant breed differences in muscle distribution were found. The individual muscles examined, when combined, comprised 40·8, 43·4, 40·5 and 39·8 % of total muscle weight respectively in the Soay, Southdown, Finnish Landrace and Oxford Down. No breed was significantly above average for every individual muscle, but the Southdown had the highest percentage in 6 out of 12 and might therefore be said to have had the most preferred muscle distribution. For most muscles examined, the percentage was slightly higher for females than for males, with totals for all 12 muscles of 41·9 and 40·4% respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 125 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. Sydney University Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1966. Relative growth in beef cattle. Aust. Met. J. 42: 87–90.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966. A nutritional effect on relative growth of muscles. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 298–304.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. H. 1967. The procedure of evaluating carcasses in growth studies. Edinburgh Sch. Agric. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Jackson, T. H. and Mansour, Y. A. 1974. Differences between groups of lamb carcasses chosen for good and poor conformation. Anim. Prod. 19: 93–105.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1968. Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes during winter. Anim. Prod. 10: 43–51.Google Scholar
Russell, W. S. 1973. Compreg Users' Guide, IUJRC Ser. Rep. No. 5. Program Library Unit, Edinburgh Regional Computing Centre.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1973. The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. 1. Empty body weight, dressed carcass weight and offal components. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar