Skip to main content Accessibility help

Approaches to the ethical evaluation of animal biotechnologies

  • T. B. Mepham (a1)


The paper explores a scheme for the ethical evaluation of animal biotechnologies, exemplified by animal transgenesis. It begins with an overview of prominent ethical theories (deontological and consequentialist) and proceeds to apply them to four ethical principles, viz. autonomy, justice, non-maleficence and beneficence, in relation to the interests of the treated animals and of different groups of people affected by the technology. Evaluation is facilitated by use of a schematic device — an ‘ethical grid’. The importance of public education and attitudes to biotechnology is illustrated by reference to recent public opinion surveys in the European Community. The paper concludes with a discussion of the impact of future trends in global population, food resources and environmental change, which emphasizes the need for a reappraisal of priorities in animal production systems. It is suggested that attempts to eradicate hunger, to improve animal welfare and to devise sustainable agricultural systems will be facilitated by greater investment in the emerging academic field of agricultural bioethics.



Hide All
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Corporate plan: 1992–1997. AFRC, Swindon.
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. 1989. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
Clark, A. J., Bessos, H., Bishop, J. O., Brown, P., Harris, H.Lathe, R., McClenaghan, M., Prowse, C., Simons, J. P., Whitelaw, C. B. A. and Wilmut, I. 1989. Expression of human anti-hemophilic factor IX in the milk of transgenic sheep. Bio-technology 7:487492.
Drori, G. S. 1993. The relationship between science, technology and the economy in lesser developed countries. Social Studies of Science 23:201215.
Ehrlich, P. 1988. The machinery of nature. Paladin, London.
Harrison, P. 1992. The third revolution: population, environment and a sustainable world. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Marlier, E. 1992. Eurobarometer 35.1. In Biotechnology in public (ed. Durant, J.), pp. 52108. Science Museum, London.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L. and Randers, J. 1992. Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future. Earthscan, London.
Mepham, T. B. 1989a. Questions of validity in mammary physiology: methodology and ethics. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 48:17.
Mepham, T. B. 1989b. Criteria for the public acceptability of biotechnological innovations in animal production. In Biotechnology in growth regulation (ed. Heap, R. B., Prosser, C. G. and Lamming, G. E.). Butterworths, London.
Merton, R. K. 1972. The institutional imperatives of science. In Sociology of science (ed. Barnes, B.), pp. 6979. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
O'Neill, O. 1993. Kantian ethics. In A companion to ethics (ed. Singer, P.), pp. 175187. Blackwell, Oxford.
Pursel, V. G., Pinkert, C. A., Miller, K. F., Bolt, D. J., Campbell, R. G., Palmiter, R. D., Brinster, R. L. and Hammer, R. E. 1989. Genetic engineering of livestock. Science 244:12811288.
Rawls, J. 1973. A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Regan, T. 1983. The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkley.
Rexroad, C. E. 1992. Transgenic technology in animal agriculture. Animal Biotechnology 3:113.
Sapontzis, S. F. 1991. We should not manipulate the genome of domestic hogs, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4:177185.
Simpson, J. R. and Conrad, J. H. 1993. Intensification of cattle production systems in Central America: why and when? Journal of Dairy Science 76:17441752.
Singer, P. 1990. Animal liberation. 2nd ed. New York Review/Random House, New York.
Thompson, P. B. 1992. Designing animals: ethical issues for genetic engineers. Journal of Dairy Science 75:22942303.
Toon, P. D. 1993. After bioethics and towards virtue? Journal of Medical Ethics 19:1718.
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Food 2000. Zed Books, London.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed