Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:26:56.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utilization of wilted and unwilted silages by lactating cows and the influence of changes in the protein and energy concentration of the supplement offered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Gordon  and
A. C. Peoples
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
A. C. Peoples
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four lactating British Friesian cows were used in a four-period partially balanced change-over design experiment to evaluate eight treatments consisting of two silage types (wilted and unwilted), each offered in addition to supplements containing both two crude protein (CP) levels (160 and 210 g/kg fresh weight) and two energy levels (10·8 and 12·9 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg fresh weight) obtained by including 100 g spray-dried tallow per kg, in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. All supplements were offered at ttie same rate of 6·8 kg/day and total diet digestibility and food utilization studies were carried out on all animals at the end of the final period of the experiment. A separate two-period change-over design expeximent, using two lactating cows fitted with rumen cannulae, was undertaken to determine the influence of the two silages on volatile fatty acid (VFA) proportions in the rumen and to measure the rates of disappearance of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen in the silages and supplements from the rumen.

There were no significant interactions between silage and supplement type in terms of animal performance. Animals offered unwilted silage consumed proportionately 003 less DM but produced 0·03 more milk than those offered wilted silage. Although total diet digestibility was not influenced by silage type because of the higher gross energy concentration of the unwilted silage the ME intake with this diet was higher than with the diet based on wilted silage and the ratios of milk energy output to ME available for production (0·54) were similar with both silages. Silage type had no effect on the rumen VFA proportions but influenced the jates of disappearance of DM and nitrogen from the rumen.

Increasing the CP concentratioryof the supplement had no effect on the intake of silage DM but resulted in a significant incrase in milk yield (0·55 kg/day) but due to a reduction in milk fat concentration there was np etfect on yield of either fat-corrected milk or milk energy. The use of the higher energy supplement depressed the intake of silage DM by 0·46 kg/day but resulted in an increase in milk yield of 0·74 kg/day. Neither CP nor energy concentration of the supplement had any effect on DM or energy digestibility of the total diet but there were considerable differences between supplements in the patterns of nitrogen and DM disappearance from the rumen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , December 1986 , pp. 355 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. and Harrison, D. G. 1977. The digestion by sheep of silages made with and without the addition of formaldehyde. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1982. Silage and milk production: comparisons between unwilted and wilted grass silages made with different additives. Grass and Forage Science 37: 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1984. Silage and milk production: A comparison between unwilted and wilted grass silages. Grass and Forage Science 39: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. and Smart, R. 1979. The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1979. The effect of protein content of the supplement for dairy cows with access ad libitum to high digestibility, wilted grass silage. Animal Production 28: 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980a. The effect of interval between harvests and wilting on silage for milk production. Animal Production 31: 35–41.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980b. The effect of silage type on the performance of lactating cows and the response to high levels of protein in the supplement. Animal Production 30: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1981. The effect of wilting of herbage on silage composition and its feeding value for milk production. Animal Production 32: 171–178.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1986a. The effect of system of silage harvesting and feeding on milk production. Grass and Forage Science In press.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1986b. The influence of system of silage harvesting and feeding and the use of protected protein on milk production. Grass and Forage Science In press.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and McMurray, C. H. 1979. The optimum level of protein in the supplement for dairy cows with access to grass silage. Animal Production 29: 283–291.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Unsworth, E. F. and Peoples, A. C. 1981. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for milk production. 54th Annual Report, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. and Edwards, R. A. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, R. 1979. The effects of wilting on fermentation in the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass and Forage Science 34: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. and Gleeson, P. A. 1979. Effect of added tallow as an energy source in dairy rations on cow performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 18: 245–251.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. and Morgan, D. J. 1980. Effect of inclusion of protected and unprotected tallow in dairy rations on cow performance. An Foras Táluntais, Animal Production Research Report, pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
orskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and McDonald, I. 1981. Degradability of protein supplements and utilization of undegraded protein by the high producing dairy cow. In Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 17–30. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Change-over designs. Technical Bulletin, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 147.Google Scholar
Peoples, A. C. 1982. Some effects of type of silage and supplementation on the utilization of silage-based diets for milk production. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingalls, J. R. and McKirdy, J. A. 1978. Replacing barley with protected tallow in ration of lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N.E., Dunkley, W. L. and Franke, A. A. 1978. Effects of feeding protected tallow to dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980. The effect of type of silage and level of concentrate supplementation offered during early lactation on total lactation performance of January/February calving cows. Animal Production 30: 341–354.Google Scholar
Unsworth, E. F. and Gordon, F. J. 1986. The energy utilisation of wilted and unwilted grass silages by lactating dairy cows. 58th Annual Report, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J. 1984. Eurowilt. Efficiency of silage systems. A comparison between unwilted and wilted silages. Landbauforschung, Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69: 88.Google Scholar