Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:57:06.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graded levels of Sesbania sesban and Leucaena leucocephala as supplements to teff straw given to Ethiopian Menz sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. L. K. Bonsi
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
P. O. Osuji
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
I. V. Nsahlai
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
A. K. Tuah
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of supplementation with fodder tree leaves on the utilization of teff straw. This ivas aimed at testing the hypothesis that forage supplements (e.g. sesbania) that disappear faster from the rumen compared with those that disappear slowly (eg. leucaena) may elicit higher intakes of the basal diet. Experiment 1 investigated the effect of level (i.e. 0,200,300 and 400 g/kg dry matter (DM) intake) of leaves of Sesbania sesban or Leucaena leucocephala on the utilization of teff straw fed ad libitum. Seven sheep were given the seven diets in four periods following a partially balanced (7 × 4) cross-over design. In experiment 2, teff straw alone or supplemented with graded levels of sesbania (250, 350 and 450 g/kg DM intake), were fed to 16 sheep in a completely randomized block design. Intake, degradability, nitrogen (N) utilization, particulate and liquid passage rates were estimated.

In experiment 1, protein source × protein level interaction was not significant. Supplementation increased intakes of total DM (P < 0-05), organic matter (P < 0·01) and N retention (P < 0·01) but had no effect on the intake of teff straw. Supplementation with sesbania, but not with leucaena, increased (P < 0·05) the apparent digestibility of DM. Both supplements increased (P < 0·05) the fractional rate of passage from the rumen. In experiment 2, graded levels of sesbania increased DM intake (P < 0·05), fractional rate of liquid outflow (P< 0·05) and tended to increase the rate of degradation. It was concluded that the effect of fodder tree leaves on roughage intake is a function of their disappearance rate from the rumen.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adejumo, J. O. 1987. Effect of graded level of Leucaena leucocephala c.v. Cunningham on feed intake and growth of West African Dwarf goats. Journal of Animal Production Research 7: 6573.Google Scholar
Ahn, J. H., Robertson, B. M., Elliot, R., Gutteridge, R. C. and Ford, C. W. 1989. Quality assessment of tropical browse legumes. Tannin content and protein degradation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 27: 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Saghier, O. A. S. and Campling, R. C. 1991. Energy and protein supplements to straw-based diets for yearling cattle: effects on straw intake and digestibility. Animal Production 52: 8392.Google Scholar
Ash, A. J. 1990. The effect of supplementation with leaves from the leguminous trees Sesbania grandiflora, Albizia chinensis and Gliricidia septum on the intake and digestibility of guinea grass hay by goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28: 225232.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Bamualim, A., Weston, R. H., Hogan, J. P and Murray, R. M. 1984. The contribution of Leucaena leucococphala to post-ruminal digestible protein for sheep fed tropical pasture hay supplemented with urea and minerals. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15: 255258.Google Scholar
Bruining, M. and Bosch, M. W. 1992. Ruminal passage rate as affected by CrNDF particle size. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37: 193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. and Moir, R. J. 1965. Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. 1. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein, urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 437449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agricultural handbook, United States Department of Agriculture, no. 379, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. and Williams, V. J. 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British journal of Nutrition 30: 313329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, H. K., Newbold, C. J. and Stewart, C. S. 1993. The contribution of bacteria and protozoa to ruminal forage fermentation in vitro, as determined by microbial gas production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 42: 193208.Google Scholar
Kempton, J. J. and Leng, R. A. 1979. Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 1. Response in growth and rumen functions of supplementation of a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42: 289302.Google Scholar
Krishnamoorthy, U., Steingass, H. and Menke, K. H. 1991. Preliminary observations on the relationships between gas production and microbial protein synthesis in vitro. Archiv fur Tierernahrung 41: 521526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMeniman, N. P., Elliot, R. and Ash, A. J. 1988. Supplementation of rice straw with crop by-products. 1. Legume straw supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. 1969. Some observations on the distribution and origin of nitrogen in sheep faeces. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73: 99111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosi, A. K. and Butterworth, M. H. 1985. The voluntary intake and digestibility of combinations of cereal crop residues and legume hay for sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 12: 241251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsahlai, I. V. 1991. The effect of quantity and quality of dietary nitrogen upon straw utilisation by steers. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Nsahlai, I. V., Siaw, D. E. K. A. and Osuji, P. O. 1994. The relationships between gas production and chemical composition of 23 browses of the genus Sesbania. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 65: 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499503.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Soller, H. and Woodward, A. 1990. Fodder tree and straw diets for sheep: intake, growth, digestibility and the effect of phenolics on nitrogen utilization. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30: 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, A. N. and Tolera, A. 1993. The supplementary value of forage legume hays in sheep feeding: feed intake, nitrogen retention and body weight change. Livestock Production Science 33: 229237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarwatt, S. V. 1990. Feed intake, growth rate and digestibility coefficients of growing sheep fed hay supplemented with Crotolaria ochroleuca. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28: 5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siaw, D. E. K. A., Osuji, P. O. and Nsahlai, I. V. 1993. Evaluation of multipurpose tree germplasm: the use of gas production and rumen degradation characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibanda, S., Osuji, P. O. and Nsahlai, I. V. 1993. The degradation of oilseed cakes and their effects on the intake and rumen degradability of maize stover fed to Ethiopian Menz sheep. Animal Production 57: 421428.Google Scholar
Silva, A. T. and Ørskov, E. R. 1988. The effect of five different supplements on the degradation of straw in sheep given untreated barley straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 289298.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.04. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tan, P. V. and Bryant, M. J. 1991. The effects of dietary supplements of fish meal on the voluntary food intake of store lambs. Animal Production 52: 271278.Google Scholar
Tolera, A. 1990. Animal producLion and the feed resource constraints in Welayta Sodo and the supplementary value of Desmodium intortum, Stylosanthes guianensis and Macrotyloma axillare when fed to growing sheep feeding on basal diet of maize stover. Msc. thesis, Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
Topark-Ngarm, A. and Gutteridge, R. C. 1990. Fodder productivity of perennial Sesbania species. In Perennial Sesbania species in agroforestry systems (ed. Macklin, B. and Evans, D. O.), proceedings of a workshop in Nairobi, Kenya, 1989, of pp. 7988. A special publication of the N.F.T.A.Google Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. and Van Soest, P. T. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, J. G. 1986. Physical parameters of fibre affecting passage from the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 27502754CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegand, R. O. 1990. Leaves of tropical trees as sources of protein in diets for sheep. Msc., thesis, University of Wisconsin Madison.Google Scholar