Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T19:05:06.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissemination of genetic improvement through a livestock industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Maurice Bichard
Maurice Bichard
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
Get access

Summary

A theoretical study is reported of the way in which additive genetic improvement, made in a nucleus population, is passed to successive levels in a three-tier multiplication system. The rate at which progress accumulates at each level is approximately equal. The extent to which each tier is genetically behind the previous one has been termed the ‘improvement lag’. These lags can be considerable; their actual size is determined by the annual rate of progress in the nucleus, the age structure in the lower tiers, and by the origins and degree of selection achieved in the animals used as parents in these tiers. Only improvements generated in the top tier are cumulative. The scope for reducing the improvement lag is discussed within the context of livestock production in Britain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , August 1971 , pp. 401 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, W. A. 1968. Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics. Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. and Hazel, L. N. 1944. Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling of livestock. J. agric. Res. 69: 459–476.Google Scholar
Pirchner, F. 1969. Population Genetics in Animal Breeding. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan. 1953. A numerical description of breed structure. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43: 334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan and Asker, A. A. 1951. The genetic history and breed-structure of British Friesian cattle. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 19: 113–130.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan and Rendel, J. M. 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 44: 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1959. A comparison of testing schemes for pigs. Anim. Prod. 1: 113–121.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1960. Efficiency of animal testing schemes. Biometrics 16: 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. H., Cook, G. E., Croft, L. E. and Steane, D. E. 1970. Rate of progress and measures of improvement within the MLC pig accreditation scheme. Anim. Prod. 12: 364–365 (Abstr.).Google Scholar