Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T02:33:51.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION OF THE CYPRUS MOUFLON (AGRINON) WITH DOMESTIC SHEEP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

A. P. mavrogenis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Herzogi
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Summary

All interspecific hybrids, both male and female, resulting from crosses between the wild sheep of- Cyprus (known locally as Aqrinon) and domesticated sheep breeds (Ovis aries), Cyprus Fat-tailed (CFT), Chios an Awassi, were found to be fertile.The chromosome complement of both species and of the hybrids was 2n=54. The survival.rate of hybrid lambs up to 105 days of age increased with a higher percentage of domesticated sheep inheritance. F2 hybrids had the lowest survival rate.

The birth weight of F1 and first backcross to domestic sheep (B,) lambs was higher than that of F2 and F1 × B1 lambs, but much lower thin that of domesticated sheep.

Most of the evidence available suggests that the wild sheep of Cyprus originates from either the European (ovis musimon) or the Asiatic' (Ovis orientalis) mouflon.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bunch, T. D. and Foote, W. C. 1976 Chromosomes, haemoglobins and transferring of Iranian domestic sheep. Journal of Heredity. 67: 167170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, T. D. and Foote, W. C. 1977 Evolution of the 2n=54 caryotype of domestic sheep. Am. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9: 509515.Google Scholar
Geist, V. 1971 Mountain sheep: a study in behaviour and evolution University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.Google Scholar
Herre, W. and Rohrs, M. 1955 Uber die Formerunannigfaltigkeit des Gehorns der Caprini. (Simpson, 1945). Der zoologische Garten, N. F. 22: 85110.Google Scholar
Korobitsyna, K. V., Nadler, C. F., Vorontsov, N. N. and Hoffmann, R. S. 1974 chromosomes of the Siberian snowsheep, ovis nivicola, and implications concerning the origin of Amphiberingiin-wi s eep (subgenus Pachyceros). Quarterly lies. 4: 235345.Google Scholar
Nadler, C. F. 1971 Chromosomes of the dall sheep, ovis dalli (Nelson). J. Mammal. 51: 461463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, C. F., Lay, D. M. and Hassinger, J. D. 1971 Cytogenetic analysis of wild sheep populations in Northern Iran. Cytogenetics 10: 137152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadler, C. F., Hoffmann, R. S. and Woolf, A. 1973 G-band patterns as chromosomal markers and the interpretation of chromosomal evolution in wild sheep (ovis). Experientia 29: 117119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, J. and Ulbrich, F. 1945 Die Chromosomen Vershiedener Caprini. 1968. Simpson, Z. Saugtierk. 33: 180186.Google Scholar
Thenius, E. and Hofer, H. 1960 Stammesgeschichte der Sangetiere. Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurster, D. H. and Benirscheke, K. 1968 Chromosome studies in the superfamily Bovoidea. Chromosoma 25: 152171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed