^{page 127 note 1} It is possible that this is a scribe's mistake, due to confusion of ideograms, and that Uruk should, in fact, be read throughout the text.

^{page 127 note 2} Referred to henceforward as STT.

^{page 128 note 1} Other possible readings are Be-, Kúr-, Bar- or Na-.

^{page 128 note 2} The “ša” is a misreading.

^{page 128 note 3} The lower head extends further to the right than the upper one and may be, in fact, a horizontal, cf. l. 23.

^{page 128 note 4} B: -tú. C: -tε.

^{page 128 note 5} Or ^kurE.SAG?

^{page 128 note 6} Word omitted in C.

^{page 128 note 7} B: šak-nu.

^{page 128 note 8} B: -u.

^{page 128 note 9} Text (B only): RI.

^{page 129 note 1} Literally “son”.

^{page 129 note 2} A part of the city Erech.

^{page 129 note 3} Or perhaps “to the country (or mountain) Erish”.

^{page 129 note 4} i.e. zebras? The word may mean piebald, skewbald, dappled or striped.

^{page 129 note 5} Literally “fill”. Text perhaps corrupt.

^{page 130 note 1} lu-⌜kin⌝: C B perhaps lu-k[in.

^{page 130 note 2} bašû-u: B A : omits -u.

^{page 130 note 3} So C; B: lu-ban-sal[( = nin ?).

^{page 130 note 4} The traces of this sign were inadvertently left in pencil in the copy. They appeared as follows:

^{page 130 note 5} Text (A only): MURUB !

^{page 130 note 6} u: A. B, C: ù.

^{page 130 note 7} Text: DINGIR. MEŠ-a-a.

^{page 130 note 8} Reading subject to collation. Perhaps šum ₄.

^{page 130 note 9} The photograph appears to show a vertical which has since broken away.

^{page 130 note 10} So A. B: up-sa-as-su.

^{page 130 note 11} So A. B: tal-tu-nȧ[m-ma-ru?].

^{page 130 note 12} So A. B perhaps [šu-ú-na-]a-[t]e-šú.

^{page 130 note 13} Either UNU or SIMUG may be intended.

^{page 131 note 1} Literally “on (them)”.

^{page 131 note 2} Literally “on it”.

^{page 131 note 3} Text: my gods (apparently corrupt).

^{page 132 note 1} The old photograph shows traces of the central head.

^{page 132 note 2} If l. 43 is a run-over from l. 42, as it appears to be, the sign ú which stands at the beginning of a line in C must belong to l. 42.

^{page 132 note 3} Text apparently a.

^{page 132 note 4} So A. C perhaps ar-ḫa-[niš].

^{page 132 note 5} So C. A perhaps ⌜KA⌝ ( = amat).

^{page 132 note 6} The “MUŠ” appears to be a misreading.

^{page 132 note 7} cf. STT. nos. 84, 92; KAR. 203 iv 30Google Scholar, etc.