Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T02:20:18.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineralogy and micromorphology of İznik ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

S. Kapur ,
N. Sakarya ,
E. A. Fitzpatrick ,
M. Pagliai ,
G. Kelling ,
E. Akça ,
C. Karaman  and
B. Sakarya
S. Kapur
Affiliation:
University of Çukurova
N. Sakarya
Affiliation:
University of Çukurova
E. A. Fitzpatrick
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
M. Pagliai
Affiliation:
University of Florence
G. Kelling
Affiliation:
University of Keele
E. Akça
Affiliation:
University of Çukurova
C. Karaman
Affiliation:
University of Çukurova
B. Sakarya
Affiliation:
University of Çukurova
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of İznik ceramics of different periods revealed that temperatures of about 800–900°C were produced during firing. Glass fragments added to the body for strengthening resulted in the formation of fibrous minerals as clusters in the pores and protruding in the glaze together with Ca and P rich minerals in the raw materials used. The pore size distribution of the pores indicates a uniform temperature rise and fall during the production of the microstructure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 48 , December 1998 , pp. 181 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aslanapa, O., 1965: Art of Anatolian Tiles and Ceramics. Research Institute of Turkish Culture 10, series 5, 1. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., Zussman, J. 1974: An introduction to rock forming minerals. LondonGoogle Scholar
FitzPatrick, E. A. 1993: Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology. LondonGoogle Scholar
Geçkinli, E. 1992: ‘Production Technology of the 16th Century İznik Ceramics’, Archaeometry '92, 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry. Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E., Bradley, W. F. 1940: ‘Investigation of the effect of heat on the clay minerals illite and montinorillonite’, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 23: 242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E., Kulbicki, G. 1957: ‘Etude des reactions de hautes temperatures dans les mineraux argileux an mogen des rayons’, Bulletin de la Societé Francaise Ceramique 36: 21–28.Google Scholar
Hamroush, H. 1986. ‘Geoarchaeology: Egyptian predynastic ceramics and geochemistry’, Episodes 5. 9 N.3: 160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1989: ‘Technical aspects of the İznik ceramics’, in Raby, J. and Atasoy, N. (eds), Iznik, 64–69. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
İsmail, S. N. A. 1975: ‘Micromorphometric Soil-Porosity Characterisation by means of electrooptical image analyses’, Soil Survey Papers 9, 104. WageningenGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. 1979: Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced Course (2nd ed). MadisonGoogle Scholar
Kapur, S., Sakarya, N., FitzPatrick, E. A. 1993. ‘Fibrous minerals in 16th century İznik Ceramics’, Geoarchaeology 8 (4): 333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, S., Sakarya, N., FitzPatrick, E. A., Pagliai, M. 1995: ‘Mineralogy and Micromorphology of Basaltic Ceramics’, British Ceramic Transactions. Journal of the British Ceramic Society 94: 33–37Google Scholar
Kelling, G., Kapur, S., Sakarya, N., Akça, E., Karaman, C., Sakarya, B., Robinson, P. 1998: ‘Basaltic tephra: a potential new resource for the ceramic industry’, British Ceramic Transactions, Journal of the British Ceramic Society (in review)Google Scholar
Kunç, T., Eker, A., Kapur, S., Çavuşgil, V. 1986: ‘Analyses of Değirmentepe foundry slugs’, Third Archaeometry Meeting. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 1–8.Google Scholar
Levin, E. M., McMurdie, H. F., Hall, F. P. 1956: ‘Phase diagrams for ceramicists’, Columbus, Q: American Society. 48Google Scholar
Mason, R. B. 1994: ‘The Provenance and Technical Origins of Ottoman Pottery: A Preliminary Petrographic study’ (abstract), Archaeometry, 29th International Symposium on Archaeometry, 9–14 May, 1994, Ankara, 57. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Raby, J. 1989: ‘The Making of İznik Tiles’, sin: Raby, J. and Atasoy, N. (eds), Iznik, 49–63. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. M., Ward, R. M. 1988: Suleiman the Magnificent. LondonGoogle Scholar
Ryan, W. 1978: Properties of Ceramic Raw Materials (2nd edition). Oxford.Google Scholar
Sakarya, N., Kapur, S., FitzPatrick, E. A. 1990: ‘Preliminary Study of the Microstructure and Mineralogy of 12th and 13th Century Ceramics, Samsat, South-eastern Turkey’: Geoarchaeology 5 (3): 275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P., Singer, S. S. 1963: Industrial Ceramics. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tite, M. S. 1989: ‘İznik Pottery: an Investigation of the Methods of Production’, Archaeometry 31, 2: 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkmenoğlu, A. G. 1989: ‘Clay mineralogy of Değirmentepe (Malatya) Ceramics: X-ray powder diffraction analysis’, Meeting of the 1st Archaeometry (AKSAY) Work-Group: 45–46. Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council Publication. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, C. M., Rosenberg, P. E., Roy, R. 1960: Changes Effected in Layer Silicates by Heating Below 550°CCrossRefGoogle Scholar