Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:46:29.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twin Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

I. Fuchi  and
K. Noda
I. Fuchi*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
K. Noda
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589, Japan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In vaginally delivered births (including a few cases where the mothers were under epidural anesthesia), differences between first and second born twins were compared according to presentation at delivery. Of twins with vertex/vertex presentation in 15 primipara cases and in 14 multipara cases, pO2 levels for the second born were significantly lower (both being p < 0.05) than for the first born. Of twins vertex/non-vertex presentation, the second born in 9 primipara cases showed significantly lower pH, pO2 and HCO3 levels (p<0.05). Also for multipara twins, the second born had significantly lower pH (p<0.05) and significantly higher pCO2 (p<0.05) values. Umbilical cord blood gas value findings indicate unfavourable conditions for second born twins.

Keywords

Umbilical cord gas valuePHpCO2pO2BicarbonatePresentation at deliveryDifference between first- and second-born
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 2-3 , July 1992 , pp. 137 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Ikenoue, T, Nakamura, Y, Ikeda, T (1991): Labor management of multiple pregnancy. Jpn J Obstet Gynecol 58: 1308–1312.Google Scholar
2. Guttmacher, AF, Kohl, SG (1958): The fetus of multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 14:528.Google Scholar
3. McCarthy, BJ, Sachs, BP, Loyde, PM, Burton, A, Terry, JS, Rachat, R (1981): The epidemiology of neonatal death in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 14:252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Naeye, RL, Tafari, N, Judge, D, Marboe, CC (1978): Twins: Causes of perinatal death in 12 United States cities and one African city. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131: 267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Takagi, T, Hsono, T, Mitsuda, N, Mizuki, J, Tanizawa, O (1991): Management of multiple pregnancy. Jpn J Obstet Gynecol 58: 1300–1307.Google Scholar
6. Wyshake, G, White, C (1963): Birth hazards of the second twin. JAMA 186: 869.Google Scholar
7. Young, BK, Suidan, J, Antonic, C, Silverman, F, Lustig, H, Wasserman, S (1985): Differences in twins: The importance of birth order. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 915–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed